Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876439›Full record

ArticleFundamental & clinical pharmacology2021

Chronic use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and mortality in COVID-19: A multicenter prospective cohort and literature review.

Nathalie Gault, Marina Esposito-Farèse, Matthieu Revest, Jocelyn Inamo, André Cabié, Élisabeth Polard, Jean-Sébastien Hulot, Jade Ghosn, Catherine Chirouze, Laurène Deconinck and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental & clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04262921 (Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04262921 unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2020 to 2025Enrolled4,415ConditionsCoronavirus Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Nathalie GaultCentre d'Investigations cliniques-Epidémiologie Clinique 1425, INSERM, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, 75018, France.
Marina Esposito-FarèseCentre d'Investigations cliniques-Epidémiologie Clinique 1425, INSERM, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, 75018, France.
Matthieu RevestService des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Univ Rennes, INSERM UMR 1230, Bacterial Regulatory RNA and Medicine, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jocelyn InamoDépartement de Cardiologie, EA7525, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
André CabiéInserm CIC 1424, Université des Antilles EA 7524, Service de maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU de Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
Élisabeth PolardDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Information Centre, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Jean-Sébastien HulotPARCC, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, 75015, France.
Jade GhosnService de Maladie Infectieuses et Tropicales, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Catherine ChirouzeService de Maladie Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
Laurène DeconinckService de Maladie Infectieuses et Tropicales, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Jean-Luc DiehlService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Laboratoire de Recherche Biochirurgicale (Fondation Carpentier), AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
Julien PoissyInserm U1285, CHU Lille, Pôle de réanimation, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Université de Lille, CNRS, Lille, France.
Olivier EpaulardService de Maladies Infectieuses et Médecine Tropicale, CHU Grenoble Rhône Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Benjamin LefèvreService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Lionel PirothDépartement d'infectiologie, Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Etienne De MontmollinService de réanimation médicale et des maladies infectieuses, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Eric OziolService de Médecine Hospitalière, CHU Beziers, Beziers, France.
Manuel EtienneService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Cédric LaouénanCentre d'Investigations cliniques-Epidémiologie Clinique 1425, INSERM, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, 75018, France.
Patrick RossignolCentre d'Investigations cliniques-plurithématique 1433, INSERM U1116, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, INSERM, Nancy, France.
Dominique CostagliolaInstitut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle Vidal-PetiotService de Physiologie rénale, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
French-Covid cohort investigators, study group

Funding

French Ministry of Health PHRC20-0424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers on the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is debated. We assessed the association between chronic use of RAAS blockers and mortality among inpatients with COVID-19 and explored reasons for discrepancies in the literature. METHODS AND

resultsWe included adult hypertensive patients from a prospective nationwide cohort of 3512 inpatients with COVID-19 up to June 30, 2020. Cox proportional hazard models with various adjustment or propensity weighting methods were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of 30-day mortality for chronic users versus non-users of RAAS blockers. We analyzed data of 1160 hypertensive patients: 719 (62%) were male and 777 (67%) were older than 65 years. The main comorbidities were diabetes (n = 416, 36%), chronic cardiac disease (n = 401, 35%), and obesity (n = 340, 29%); 705 (61%) received oxygen therapy. We recorded 135 (11.6%) deaths within 30 days of diagnosis. We found no association between chronic use of RAAS blockers and mortality (unadjusted HR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.8-1.6]; propensity inverse probability treatment weighted HR = 1.09 [0.86-1.39]; propensity standardized mortality ratio weighted HR = 1.08 [0.79-1.47]). Our comprehensive review of previous studies highlighted that significant associations were mostly found in unrestricted populations with inappropriate adjustment, or with biased in-hospital exposure measurement.

conclusionOur results do not support previous concerns regarding these drugs, nor a potential protective effect as reported in previous poorly designed studies and meta-analyses. RAAS blockers should not be discontinued during the pandemic, while in-hospital management of these drugs will be clarified by randomized trials. NCT04262921.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleFranceHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesRenin-Angiotensin SystemAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockersangiotensin antagonistsCOVID-19hypertensionmortalitypropensity scoreRAAS blockers

Identifiers

PMID33876439
PMCPMC8250758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.