Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876342›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

Metal accumulations in aquatic organisms and health risks in an acid mine-affected site in South China.

Wing Sze Chan, Joyanto Routh, Chen Luo, Mårten Dario, Yuqing Miao, Dinggui Luo, Lezhang Wei

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impact Evaluation of Acid Mine Drainage on Zebrafish (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wing Sze ChanDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Joyanto RouthDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden. joyanto.routh@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-1593
Chen LuoDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Mårten DarioDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Yuqing MiaoSchool of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, 241002, China.
Dinggui LuoLinköping University - Guangzhou University Research Center on Urban Sustainable Development, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Lezhang WeiLinköping University - Guangzhou University Research Center on Urban Sustainable Development, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Linköping University · SEGuangzhou University · CNAnhui Normal University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (CN) 2018A030310309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal contamination from base metal sulphide mines is a major environmental challenge that poses many ecological and health risks. We examined the metal concentrations in the Dabaoshan mine in South China in water, sediments, and aquatic organisms and their specific characteristics (i.e. size, body tissue, species, and habitat) along the Hengshi and Wengjiang River courses to assess acid mine drainage remediation efforts. Metal concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, thallium, and zinc were examined in tissues (i.e. gills, intestines, and muscles) of 17 freshwater species of fish, shrimps, and crabs. Metals in tissues followed the trend: intestines > gills > muscles; nearly all intestine samples exceeded the safe limits of metals analysed in this study. There is a positive correlation between distance from the mine and metal concentrations related to the flow of surface water and the habitat of aquatic organisms. The concentrations of arsenic, copper, and zinc were the highest in aquatic organisms, and the distribution was influenced by physical (distance from mine, currents, and seasonality), chemical (pH and competing ions), and biological (species, habitat, and predator-prey relation) factors. Large demersal fish and benthic fauna had higher concentrations of metals. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of metals, as well as the high metal pollution index and target hazard quotient (arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, thallium, and zinc), occurred in bottom feeders (C. aumtus, X. argentea) and fish belonging to higher trophic levels (P. fulvidraco, O. mossambicus). Lead and cadmium indicated the highest level of biomagnification from prey to predator. Health risks exist from the dietary intake of common aquatic species such as tilapia and carp besides crustaceans due to high arsenic, cadmium, lead, and thallium levels. Further reduction of metals is necessary to improve the effects of acid mine drainage in the catchment.

Indexed as

CarpsMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsChinaEnvironmental MonitoringGeologic SedimentsMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcid mineAquatic organismsBioaccumulationBiomagnificationMetalsSedimentsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID33876342
PMCPMC8528778
OpenAlexW3156304531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.