Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876324›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2021

Prevention of delayed bleeding with vonoprazan in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatment.

Hiroko Abe, Waku Hatta, Yohei Ogata, Tomoyuki Koike, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Kenichiro Nakagawa, Takeshi Kanno, Kaname Uno, Naoki Asano and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroko AbeDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Waku HattaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan. waku-style@festa.ocn.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-0281
Yohei OgataDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Tomoyuki KoikeDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Masahiro SaitoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Xiaoyi JinDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Kenichiro NakagawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Takeshi KannoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Kaname UnoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Naoki AsanoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Akira ImataniDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Tomohiro NakamuraDepartment of Health Record Informatics, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Naoki NakayaDepartment of Health Sciences, Saitama Prefectural University, 820 Sannomiya, Koshigaya, Japan.
Kunio TarasawaDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kenji FujimoriDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kiyohide FushimiDepartment of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi MasamuneDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPSaitama Prefectural University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed bleeding is the major adverse event in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatment (UGET). We aimed to investigate the efficacy of vonoprazan, which is the novel strong antisecretory agent, to reduce the risk for delayed bleeding in comparison with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in UGET.

methodsThis retrospective population-based cohort study used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We included patients on vonoprazan or PPI in UGET between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding. We conducted propensity score matching to balance the comparison groups, and logistic regression analyses to compare the bleeding outcomes.

resultsWe enrolled 124,422 patients, in which 34,822 and 89,600 were prescribed with vonoprazan and PPI, respectively. After propensity score matching, the risk for delayed bleeding was lower in vonoprazan than in PPI (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.80), consistent with sensitivity analysis results. In the subgroup analyses of seven UGET procedures, vonoprazan was significantly advantageous in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD) (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94) and gastroduodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (GD-ESD) (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.75), although correction for multiple testing of the outcome data removed the significance in E-ESD. These results were also consistent with sensitivity analysis results. In the five other procedures, no significant advantage was found.

conclusionsThis nationwide study found that, compared with PPI, vonoprazan can reduce delayed bleeding with approximately 30% in GD-ESD. Vonoprazan has the possibility to become a new treatment method for preventing delayed bleeding in this procedure.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFemaleHemorrhageHumansJapanMalePyrrolesRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeUpper Gastrointestinal Tract1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanaminePyrrolesSulfonamidesDelayed bleedingUpper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatmentVonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID33876324
OpenAlexW3154979715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.