ArticleLasers in medical science2022
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy between conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with two different lens fragmentation patterns.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phaco-trabeculectomy versus MSICS-trabeculectomy for coexisting cataract and glaucoma: visual and IOP outcomes from a randomized trial in Nigeria.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification Combined with Vitrectomy for Cataract Complicated with Fundus Disease: Superior Efficacy in Patients with Vitreous Opacity and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Changes of Aqueous Humor Cytokine and Chemokine Profiles in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery in Comparison to Conventional Phacoemulsification.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Blebitis after temporal approach MSICS and phacoemulsification performed post-trabeculectomy: incidence, management, and outcomes at ECWA eye hospital, Kano.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Surgeries at ECWA Eye Hospital: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Clinical observation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for diabetic cataract.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Phacoemulsification: Proposals for Improvement in Its Application.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The use of lens anterior capsule disc for corneal endothelium protection during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with low endothelial cell density.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
- Cumulative dissipated energy in eyes with and without corneal opacity.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to compare the total ultrasound power used between eyes undergoing different lens fragmentation patterns of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS). A total of 506 patient eyes underwent preoperative grading of lens opacity using the Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCSIII). The eyes were divided into two subgroups: subgroup 1 had a LOCSIII grade of 1-3, and subgroup 2 had a LOCSIII grade of 4-6. The eyes underwent FLACS (LenSx) for clear corneal wound, capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation. Either a grid pattern or radial pattern was used for lens fragmentation. The eyes received one of the following three treatments: (1) CPS without femtosecond laser assistant, (2) FLACS with a grid pattern (FGP) lens fragment, or (3) FLACS with a quadrant pattern (FQP) lens fragment. The mean cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) for each subgroup and treatment was evaluated. The mean CDE was lower in the two FLACS groups (1.21±1.91 in FGP and 1.22±1.92 in FQP) than that in the CPG group (2.67±2.84). In subgroup 1, CDE was higher in the CPG group (1.54±1.18) as compared with the FLACS groups (0.16±0.31 in FGP and 0.74±1.17 in FQP; P<0.001). In subgroup 2, CDE was higher in the CPG (6.47±3.46) as compared with the FLACS groups (2.74±2.21 in FGP and 5.34±2.17 in FQP; P<0.001). CDE was lower in the two FLACS groups than that in the CPS group, and CDE was the lowest with FGP in both subgroups 1 and 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.