Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876214›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2021

Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco.

Farah Marraha, Ibtissam Al Faker, Faiza Charif, Hanane Chahoub, Youness Benyamna, Najlaa Rahmani, Soukaina Kabbou, Yasmine Rkiek, Adil Najdi, Salim Gallouj

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farah MarrahaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-954X
Ibtissam Al FakerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Faiza CharifDepartment of Epidemiology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Hanane ChahoubDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Youness BenyamnaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Najlaa RahmaniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Soukaina KabbouDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Yasmine RkiekDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Adil NajdiDepartment of Epidemiology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Salim GalloujDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier, Tetouan, Al Hoceima, Morocco.
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealth care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.

resultsIn total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).

conclusionsOur survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational ExposureHealth PersonnelHumansMoroccoPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesadverse skin reactionsCOVID-19eye protectionhand hygienehealthcare workersmedical maskpersonal protective equipmentrespiratory protectionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33876214
PMCPMC8083207
OpenAlexW3152898875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.