Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876183›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021

Nutritional epidemiology and the Women's Health Initiative: a review.

Ross L Prentice, Barbara V Howard, Linda Van Horn, Marian L Neuhouser, Garnet L Anderson, Lesley F Tinker, Johanna W Lampe, Daniel Raftery, Mary Pettinger, Aaron K Aragaki and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000611 (Women's Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000611 phase3completednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative (WHI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConditionsBone Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Colonic NeoplasmsArmshormone replacement therapy, estrogens, progestins, estrogen replacement therapy, diet, fat-restricted
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reply to WC Willett and D Ludwig.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ross L PrenticeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barbara V HowardDepartment of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, and MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Linda Van HornDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-5806
Marian L NeuhouserDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-0000
Garnet L AndersonDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lesley F TinkerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2469-1929
Johanna W LampeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2717-3780
Daniel RafteryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-8118
Mary PettingerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aaron K AragakiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cynthia A ThomsonMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Yasmin Mossavar-RahmaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-6124
Marcia L StefanickStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jane A CauleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jacques E RossouwNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9972-0371
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rowan T ChlebowskiLundquist Institute for Innovative Biomedical Research at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study (NPAAS)R01CA119171 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian L Neuhouser · 2006 to 2026
$14.3M
Multiplexed UPLC-MS/MS System for Advanced Target MetabolomicsS10OD021562 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, DANIEL · 2016 to 2016
$596k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119171NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600004CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600004INIH HHS S10 OD021562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dietary modification (DM) clinical trial, within the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), studied a low-fat dietary pattern intervention that included guidance to increase vegetables, fruit, and grains. This study was motivated in part from uncertainty about the reliability of observational studies examining the association between dietary fat and chronic disease risk by using self-reported dietary data. In addition to this large trial, which had breast and colorectal cancer as its primary outcomes, a substantial biomarker research effort was initiated midway in the WHI program to contribute to nutritional epidemiology research more broadly. Here we review and update findings from the DM trial and from the WHI nutritional biomarker studies and examine implications for future nutritional epidemiology research. The WHI included the randomized controlled DM trial (n = 48,835) and a prospective cohort observational (OS) study (n = 93,676), both among postmenopausal US women, aged 50-79 y when enrolled during 1993-1998. Also reviewed is a nutrition and physical activity assessment study in a subset of 450 OS participants (2007-2009) and a related controlled feeding study among 153 WHI participants (2010-2014). Long-term follow-up in the DM trial provides evidence for intervention-related reductions in breast cancer mortality, diabetes requiring insulin, and coronary artery disease in the subset of normotensive healthy women, without observed adverse effects or changes in all-cause mortality. Studies of intake biomarkers, and of biomarker-calibrated intake, suggest important associations of total energy intake and macronutrient dietary composition with the risk for major chronic diseases among postmenopausal women. Collectively these studies argue for a nutrition epidemiology research agenda that includes major efforts in nutritional biomarker development, and in the application of biomarkers combined with self-reported dietary data in disease association analyses. We expect such efforts to yield novel disease association findings and to inform disease prevention approaches for potential testing in dietary intervention trials. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.

Indexed as

DietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaWomen's HealthFemaleHumansNutritional Statusbiomarkercancercardiovascular diseasediabetesdietary interventiondiet assessmentenergy consumptionmacronutrientmeasurement errorwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID33876183
PMCPMC8120331
OpenAlexW3155619495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.