ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021
Trends in research related to high myopia from 2010 to 2019: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Complications of Myopia: Bibliometric Analysis and Citation Networks.Reports (MDPI) · 2023Article
- Value of optical coherence tomography measurement of macular thickness and optic disc parameters for glaucoma screening in patients with high myopia.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Highly cited publication performance in the ophthalmology category in the Web of Science database: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a novel deep learning based screening system for pathologic myopia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Visualized analysis of research on myopic traction maculopathy based on CiteSpace.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Comment on: Trends in research related to high myopia from 2010 to 2019: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Research trends and hotspots in the relationship between outdoor activities and myopia: A bibliometric analysis based on the web of science database from 2006 to 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the global trends in and explore hotspots of high myopia (HM) research.
methodsThis bibliometric analysis was used to reveal the publication trends in HM research field based on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). VOSviewer version 1.6.13 software was used to analyze the data and construct a knowledge map including the yearly publication number, journals, countries, international collaborations, authors, research hotspots, and intellectual base in HM.
resultsThe search engine found 3544 peer-reviewed publications on HM between 2010 and 2019, and the yearly research output substantially elevated over the past decade. China is the top publishing country, and Sun Yat-sen University was the most active academic institution. Jonas JB is the top publishing scientist, and
conclusionThe evaluation of development trends based on the data extracted from WoSCC can provide valuable information and guidance for ophthalmologists and public health researchers to improve management procedures in HM field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.