Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875927›Full record

ArticleInternational IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering2019

Neuromorphic vision and tactile fusion for upper limb prosthesis control.

Mark Hays, Luke Osborn, Rohan Ghosh, Mark Iskarous, Christopher Hunt, Nitish V Thakor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark HaysDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Luke OsbornDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Rohan GhoshSinapse Institute for Neurotechnology and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 28 Medical Drive, #05-02, Singapore 117456, Singapore.
Mark IskarousDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Christopher HuntDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Nitish V ThakorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMMUNICATION SOUND PERCEPTIONR01DC003180 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 1997 to 2024
$12.0M
Training Program in NeuroengineeringT32EB003383 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NITISH VYOMESH THAKOR · 2004 to 2026
$6.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB003383NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major issue with upper limb prostheses is the disconnect between sensory information perceived by the user and the information perceived by the prosthesis. Advances in prosthetic technology introduced tactile information for monitoring grasping activity, but visual information, a vital component in the human sensory system, is still not fully utilized as a form of feedback to the prosthesis. For able-bodied individuals, many of the decisions for grasping or manipulating an object, such as hand orientation and aperture, are made based on visual information before contact with the object. We show that inclusion of neuromorphic visual information, combined with tactile feedback, improves the ability and efficiency of both able-bodied and amputee subjects to pick up and manipulate everyday objects. We discovered that combining both visual and tactile information in a real-time closed loop feedback strategy generally decreased the completion time of a task involving picking up and manipulating objects compared to using a single modality for feedback. While the full benefit of the combined feedback was partially obscured by experimental inaccuracies of the visual classification system, we demonstrate that this fusion of neuromorphic signals from visual and tactile sensors can provide valuable feedback to a prosthetic arm for enhancing real-time function and usability.

Identifiers

PMID33875927
PMCPMC8053366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.