Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875863›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2021

Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum.

Georgia C Drew, Emily J Stevens, Kayla C King

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SymbioticmBio · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Salamander-Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  13. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Marine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgia C Drew *Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-1821
Emily J Stevens *Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5299-4401
Kayla C KingDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kayla.king@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-9220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtually all plants and animals, including humans, are home to symbiotic microorganisms. Symbiotic interactions can be neutral, harmful or have beneficial effects on the host organism. However, growing evidence suggests that microbial symbionts can evolve rapidly, resulting in drastic transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum. In this Review, we integrate theoretical and empirical findings to discuss the mechanisms underpinning these evolutionary shifts, as well as the ecological drivers and why some host-microorganism interactions may be stuck at the end of the continuum. In addition to having biomedical consequences, understanding the dynamic life of microorganisms reveals how symbioses can shape an organism's biology and the entire community, particularly in a changing world.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBacteriaHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansMiceParasitesSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33875863
PMCPMC8054256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.