Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875838›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2021

Different computations underlie overt presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Hsin-Hung Li, Jasmine Pan, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatiotemporal Evidence Accumulation Through Saccadic Sampling for Object Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Presaccadic preview shapes postsaccadic processing more where perception is poor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hsin-Hung LiDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. hsin.hung.li@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-2071
Jasmine PanDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7369-9225
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-9056

Funding

Temporal Dynamics of Visual Perception and AttentionR01EY019693 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2010 to 2022
$4.0M
Training a new generation of computational neuroscientists bridging neurobiologyR90DA043849 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MA, WEI JI, WANG, XIAO-JING · 2016 to 2020
$926k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019693NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA043849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception and action are tightly coupled: visual responses at the saccade target are enhanced right before saccade onset. This phenomenon, presaccadic attention, is a form of overt attention-deployment of visual attention with concurrent eye movements. Presaccadic attention is well-documented, but its underlying computational process remains unknown. This is in stark contrast to covert attention-deployment of visual attention without concurrent eye movements-for which the computational processes are well characterized by a normalization model. Here, a series of psychophysical experiments reveal that presaccadic attention modulates visual performance only via response gain changes. A response gain change was observed even when attention field size increased, violating the predictions of a normalization model of attention. Our empirical results and model comparisons reveal that the perceptual modulations by overt presaccadic and covert spatial attention are mediated through different computations.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceSpatial ProcessingVisual PerceptionAttentionHumansPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsSaccadesSpatial Navigation

Identifiers

PMID33875838
PMCPMC8552811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.