Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875805›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2022

Respiratory muscle function in the newborn: a narrative review.

Theodore Dassios, Aggeliki Vervenioti, Gabriel Dimitriou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06404294 (A Randomized Controlled Study of the External Diaphragm Pacemaker Assisted Extubation in Premature Infants With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06404294 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Study of the External Diaphragm Pacemaker Assisted Extubation in Premature Infants With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsInvasive Mechanical Ventilation, ExtubationArmsExternal Diaphragm Pacemaker treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Forgotten muscle: diaphragm and sudden infant death syndrome.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Cardiopulmonary Benefits of Exercise in Adolescents.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Role of the Chest Wall in Newborn Respiratory Function at Birth.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Imaging insights of FDG-PET from neonates to infants.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Theodore DassiosDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK. theodore.dassios@kcl.ac.uk.
Aggeliki VerveniotiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Gabriel DimitriouDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
University of Patras · GRKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to summarise the current evidence and methods used to assess respiratory muscle function in the newborn, focusing on current and future potential clinical applications. The respiratory muscles undertake the work of breathing and consist mainly of the diaphragm, which in the newborn is prone to dysfunction due to lower muscle mass, flattened shape and decreased content of fatigue-resistant muscle fibres. Premature infants are prone to diaphragmatic dysfunction due to limited reserves and limited capacity to generate force and avoid fatigue. Methods to assess the respiratory muscles in the newborn include electromyography, maximal respiratory pressures, assessment for thoraco-abdominal asynchrony and composite indices, such as the pressure-time product and the tension time index. Recently, there has been significant interest and a growing body of research in assessing respiratory muscle function using bedside ultrasonography. Neurally adjusted ventilator assist is a novel ventilation mode, where the level of the respiratory support is determined by the diaphragmatic electrical activity. Prolonged mechanical ventilation, hypercapnia and hypoxia, congenital anomalies and systemic or respiratory infection can negatively impact respiratory muscle function in the newborn, while caffeine and synchronised or volume-targeted ventilation have a positive effect on respiratory muscle function compared to conventional, non-triggered or pressure-limited ventilation, respectively. IMPACT: Respiratory muscle function is impaired in prematurely born neonates and infants with congenital anomalies, such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Respiratory muscle function is negatively affected by prolonged ventilation and infection and positively affected by caffeine and synchronised compared to non-synchronised ventilation modes. Point-of-care diaphragmatic ultrasound and neurally adjusted ventilator assist are recent diagnostic and therapeutic technological developments with significant clinical applicability.

Indexed as

CaffeineRespiratory MusclesDiaphragmFatigueHumansInfant, NewbornRespiration, ArtificialCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID33875805
PMCPMC8053897
OpenAlexW3155568058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.