Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875738›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

A randomized controlled trial of ovarian reserve preservation and hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy.

Soo Jin Park, Aeran Seol, Nara Lee, Seungmee Lee, Hee Seung Kim, PRAHA Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03374397 (A Single Center, Randomized, Investigator-initiated Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Preservation of Ovarian Function and Hemostasis, and Its Safety of Surgiguard@ During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03374397 phase3completednot on this map

A Single Center, Randomized, Investigator-initiated Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Preservation of Ovarian Function and Hemostasis, and Its Safety of Surgiguard@ During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled52ConditionsOvarian Cyst BenignArmsSurgiguard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Feasibility and safety of 4DryFieldArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Soo Jin ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Aeran SeolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Nara LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06135, Republic of Korea.
Seungmee LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, 41931, Republic of Korea.
Hee Seung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. bboddi0311@gmail.com.
PRAHA Study Group
Seoul National University · KRCHA University · KRKeimyung University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ovarian cystectomy is crucial for reproductive-age women. This study was a single-blinded, single-center, and randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of hemostatic agents on the preservation of ovarian reserve and hemostasis during LESS ovarian cystectomy. Patients with unilateral ovarian cyst were randomized to the hemostatic agent and coagulation groups according to the hemostasis method. Afterwards, the patients underwent LESS ovarian cystectomy, and hemostasis was performed after ovarian cyst excision according to the assigned hemostasis method. If hemostasis was not completed within 10 min. After discharge, the patients were followed until 3 months after surgery. We compared the hemoglobin, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and ovarian volumes before surgery, and 2 days, 1 week, and 3 months after surgery (3 M-POST), and the decline ratio between the two groups. The decline ratio of serum AMH levels was greater at 3 M-POST in the coagulation than in the hemostatic agent group (median intention-to-treat [ITT], - 36.7 vs. - 13.3%; per-protocol [PP], - 36.8 vs. - 13.3%; P < 0.05). Notably, the difference of the decline ratio of serum AMH levels was only shown in endometriosis patients (median; ITT, - 50.7 vs. - 14.4%; PP, - 50.7% vs. - 14.4%; P < 0.05), while there was no difference in non-endometriosis patients. In conclusion, Hemostatic agents may be non-inferior to bipolar coagulation for preserving ovarian reserve and hemostasis during LESS ovarian cystectomy, in particular, for endometriosis patients. (Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03374397).

Indexed as

Ovarian ReserveAdolescentAdultBlood CoagulationEndometriosisFemaleHemostaticsHumansMiddle AgedOvarian CystsOvariectomySingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID33875738
PMCPMC8055671
OpenAlexW3153685877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.