Trial reportScientific reports2021
A randomized controlled trial of ovarian reserve preservation and hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03374397 (A Single Center, Randomized, Investigator-initiated Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Preservation of Ovarian Function and Hemostasis, and Its Safety of Surgiguard@ During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Center, Randomized, Investigator-initiated Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Preservation of Ovarian Function and Hemostasis, and Its Safety of Surgiguard@ During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential damage to ovarian reserve from laparoscopic electrocoagulation in endometriomas and benign ovarian cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of 4DryFieldArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Ovarian reserve integrated damage (ORI) model for predicting ovarian function recovery after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial.BMC women's health · 2026Trial
- Oxidized cellulose polymer outperforms traditional hemostasis in preserving ovarian reserve during LESS cystectomy: a prospective comparative study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Comparative effect of different surgical treatments for ovarian endometrioma on anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Changes in ovarian reserve function after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Changing Etiological Spectrum of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency over the Past Decades: A Comparative Analysis of Two Cohorts from a Single Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The risk factors, pathogenesis and treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Impacts of endometrioma on ovarian aging from basic science to clinical management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ovarian cystectomy is crucial for reproductive-age women. This study was a single-blinded, single-center, and randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of hemostatic agents on the preservation of ovarian reserve and hemostasis during LESS ovarian cystectomy. Patients with unilateral ovarian cyst were randomized to the hemostatic agent and coagulation groups according to the hemostasis method. Afterwards, the patients underwent LESS ovarian cystectomy, and hemostasis was performed after ovarian cyst excision according to the assigned hemostasis method. If hemostasis was not completed within 10 min. After discharge, the patients were followed until 3 months after surgery. We compared the hemoglobin, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and ovarian volumes before surgery, and 2 days, 1 week, and 3 months after surgery (3 M-POST), and the decline ratio between the two groups. The decline ratio of serum AMH levels was greater at 3 M-POST in the coagulation than in the hemostatic agent group (median intention-to-treat [ITT], - 36.7 vs. - 13.3%; per-protocol [PP], - 36.8 vs. - 13.3%; P < 0.05). Notably, the difference of the decline ratio of serum AMH levels was only shown in endometriosis patients (median; ITT, - 50.7 vs. - 14.4%; PP, - 50.7% vs. - 14.4%; P < 0.05), while there was no difference in non-endometriosis patients. In conclusion, Hemostatic agents may be non-inferior to bipolar coagulation for preserving ovarian reserve and hemostasis during LESS ovarian cystectomy, in particular, for endometriosis patients. (Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03374397).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.