Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Prefrontal high definition cathodal tDCS modulates executive functions only when coupled with moderate aerobic exercise in healthy persons.

Fabian Thomas, Fabian Steinberg, Nils Henrik Pixa, Alisa Berger, Ming-Yang Cheng, Michael Doppelmayr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabian Thomas *Department for Sports Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian Steinberg *School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 1246 Pleasant Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. fsteinberg@lsu.edu.
Nils Henrik PixaDepartment for Neuromotor Behavior and Exercise, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Westfälische Wilhelms University Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Alisa BergerDepartment for Sports Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Ming-Yang ChengSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, No. 650 Qingyuan Ring Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Michael DoppelmayrDepartment for Sports Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELouisiana State University · USShanghai University of Sport · CNUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to enhance cognitive performance. However, its effectiveness has not yet been unequivocally shown. Thus, here we tested whether coupling tDCS with a bout of aerobic exercise (AE) is more effective in modulating cognitive functions than tDCS or AE alone. One hundred twenty-two healthy participants were assigned to five randomized controlled crossover experiments. Two multimodal target experiments (EXP-4: anodal vs. sham tDCS during AE; EXP-5: cathodal vs. sham tDCS during AE) investigated whether anodal (a-tDCS) or cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) applied during AE over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left DLPFC) affects executive functioning (inhibition ability). In three unimodal control experiments, the participants were either stimulated (EXP-1: anodal vs. sham tDCS, EXP-2: cathodal vs. sham tDCS) or did AE (EXP-3: AE vs. active control). Participants performed an Eriksen flanker task during ergometer cycling at moderate intensity (in EXP. 3-5). Only c-tDCS during AE had a significant adverse effect on the inhibition task, with decreased accuracy. This outcome provides preliminary evidence that c-tDCS during AE over the left DLPFC might effectively modulate inhibition performance compared to c-tDCS alone. However, more systematic research is needed in the future.

Indexed as

ExerciseAdultCognitionCross-Over StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33875729
PMCPMC8055664
OpenAlexW3153959819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.