Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Trophic indices for micronektonic fishes reveal their dependence on the microbial system in the North Atlantic.

Antonio Bode, M Pilar Olivar, Santiago Hernández-León

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonio BodeCentro Oceanográfico de A Coruña, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, IEO, 15080, A Coruña, Spain. antonio.bode@ieo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9535-2548
M Pilar OlivarInstitut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-9181
Santiago Hernández-LeónUnidad Asociada ULPGC-CSIC, Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, IOCAG, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus de Taliarte, 35214, Telde, Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-4969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of microbes for the functioning of oceanic food webs is well established, but their relevance for top consumers is still poorly appreciated. Large differences in individual size, and consequently in growth rates and the relevant spatial and temporal scales involved, make the integration of microorganisms and large metazoans in a common food web framework difficult. Using stable isotopes, this study estimated the trophic position of 13 species of micronektonic fishes to examine the microbial and metazoan contribution to mid trophic level consumers. Vertically migrant species displayed higher trophic positions than non-migrant species in all depth layers. The estimated trophic positions agreed well with those from the literature, but all species displayed mean increases between 0.5 and 0.8 trophic positions when taking into account microbial trophic steps. Trophic position, but not the relative importance of the microbial food web, increased with individual size, suggesting that current estimates of the trophic position of top consumers and of the length of oceanic food webs are too low because they are based only on metazoan trophic steps. This finding calls for a review of trophic position estimates and of the efficiency of trophic transfers along oceanic food webs.

Indexed as

EcosystemFeeding BehaviorFood ChainMicrobiotaNutritional StatusAnimalsFishesNitrogen IsotopesNutrition AssessmentOceans and SeasNitrogen Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID33875692
PMCPMC8055700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.