Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875413›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2021

Wheeze Recognition Algorithm for Remote Medical Care Device in Children: Validation Study.

Chizu Habukawa, Naoto Ohgami, Takahiko Arai, Haruyuki Makata, Morimitsu Tomikawa, Tokihiko Fujino, Tetsuharu Manabe, Yoshihito Ogihara, Kiyotaka Ohtani, Kenichiro Shirao and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Chizu HabukawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Minami Wakayama Medical Center, Tanabe, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-1446
Naoto OhgamiOmron Healthcare Co, Ltd, Muko, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7275-1968
Takahiko AraiArai Pediatric Clinic, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-3740
Haruyuki MakataMakata Pediatrics & Allergy Clinic, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6227-8858
Morimitsu TomikawaOdasaga Pediatrics and Allergy, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-3296
Tokihiko FujinoKokura Allergy Clinic, Kokura, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-875X
Tetsuharu ManabeManabe Pediatric Clinic, Ebina, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-2142
Yoshihito OgiharaOgihara Kids Clinic, Zama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-5987
Kiyotaka OhtaniKirin Kids Allergy Clinic, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-0818
Kenichiro ShiraoShirao Clinic of Pediatrics and Pediatric Allergy, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1588-8036
Kazuko SugaiSugai Children's Clinic Pediatrics/Allergy, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-5063
Kei AsaiOmron Healthcare Co, Ltd, Muko, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-9950
Tetsuya SatoOmron Healthcare Co, Ltd, Muko, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-7198
Katsumi MurakamiDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Sakai Sakibana Hospital, Sakai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6431-9112
Omron (Japan) · JPEbina General Hospital · JPKirin (Japan) · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPMinami Wakayama Medical Center · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPSakakibara Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2020, peoples' lifestyles have been largely changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. In the medical field, although many patients prefer remote medical care, this prevents the physician from examining the patient directly; thus, it is important for patients to accurately convey their condition to the physician. Accordingly, remote medical care should be implemented and adaptable home medical devices are required. However, only a few highly accurate home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection as an exacerbation sign.

objectiveWe developed a new handy home medical device with an automatic wheeze recognition algorithm, which is available for clinical use in noisy environments such as a pediatric consultation room or at home. Moreover, the examination time is only 30 seconds, since young children cannot endure a long examination time without crying or moving. The aim of this study was to validate the developed automatic wheeze recognition algorithm as a clinical medical device in children at different institutions.

methodsA total of 374 children aged 4-107 months in pediatric consultation rooms of 10 institutions were enrolled in this study. All participants aged ≥6 years were diagnosed with bronchial asthma and patients ≤5 years had reported at least three episodes of wheezes. Wheezes were detected by auscultation with a stethoscope and recorded for 30 seconds using the wheeze recognition algorithm device (HWZ-1000T) developed based on wheeze characteristics following the Computerized Respiratory Sound Analysis guideline, where the dominant frequency and duration of a wheeze were >100 Hz and >100 ms, respectively. Files containing recorded lung sounds were assessed by each specialist physician and divided into two groups: 177 designated as "wheeze" files and 197 as "no-wheeze" files. Wheeze recognitions were compared between specialist physicians who recorded lung sounds and those recorded using the wheeze recognition algorithm. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for all recorded sound files, and evaluated the influence of age and sex on the wheeze detection sensitivity.

resultsDetection of wheezes was not influenced by age and sex. In all files, wheezes were differentiated from noise using the wheeze recognition algorithm. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the wheeze recognition algorithm were 96.6%, 98.5%, 98.3%, and 97.0%, respectively. Wheezes were automatically detected, and heartbeat sounds, voices, and crying were automatically identified as no-wheeze sounds by the wheeze recognition algorithm.

conclusionsThe wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy; therefore, it might be useful in the practical implementation of asthma management at home. Only a few home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection. The wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy and will be useful for wheezing management at home and in remote medical care.

Indexed as

algorithmasthmachildrenchronic illnessdetectionhome managementinfantmedical devicespediatricsremotevalidationwheeze recognition algorithmwheezing

Identifiers

PMID33875413
PMCPMC8277407
OpenAlexW3153735175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.