Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33874994›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2021

Mobile App-based documentation of patient-reported outcomes - 3-months results from a proof-of-concept study on modern rheumatology patient management.

Jutta G Richter, Christina Nannen, Gamal Chehab, Hasan Acar, Arnd Becker, Reinhart Willers, Dörte Huscher, Matthias Schneider

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02565225 (Mobile Medically Supervised Patient Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using DocuMed.rh and RheumaLive App), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02565225 completednot on this map

Mobile Medically Supervised Patient Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using DocuMed.rh and RheumaLive App

TypeobservationalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2014 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsRheumaLive App use
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jutta G RichterPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. jutta.richter@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-3243
Christina NannenPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Gamal ChehabPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Hasan AcarPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Arnd BeckerOrtenau Klinikum Offenburg-Kehl, Offenburg, Germany.
Reinhart WillersPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dörte HuscherInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SchneiderPoliclinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DEOrtenau Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile medical applications (Apps) offer innovative solutions for patients' self-monitoring and new patient management opportunities. Prior to routine clinical application feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using an App that includes electronic (e) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) warrant evaluation. Therefore, we performed a proof-of-concept study in which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients used an App (RheumaLive) to document their disease.

methodsAccurate PROM reporting via an App in comparison to paper-based versions was investigated to exclude media bias. Sixty participants recruited from 268 consecutive RA outpatients completed paper-based and electronic PROMs (Hannover Functional Questionnaire/derived HAQ; modified RA disease activity index) using the App at baseline and follow-up visits. Between visits, patients used their App on their own smartphone according to their preferences. The equivalence of PROM data and user experiences from patients and physicians were evaluated.

resultsPatients' (78.3% female) mean (SD) age was 50.1 (13.1) years, disease duration 10.5 (9.1) years, and paper-based HAQ 0.78 (0.59). Mean confidence in Apps scored 3.5 (1.1, Likert scale 1 to 6). ePROMs' scores obtained by patients' data entry in the App were equivalent to paper-based ones and preferred by the patients. After 3 months, the App retention rate was 71.7%. Patients' overall satisfaction with the App was 2.2 (0.9, Likert scale 1 to 6). Patients and physicians valued the App, i.e., for patient-physician interaction: 87% reported that it was easier for them to document the course of the disease using the App than "only" answering questions about their current health during routine outpatient visits. Further App use was recommended in 77.3% of the patients, and according to physicians, in seven patients, the App use contributed to an increased adherence to therapy.

conclusionOur study provides an essential basis for the broader implementation of medical Apps in routine care. We demonstrated the feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using a smartphone App in RA. App use was convincing as a reliable option to perform continuous, remote monitoring of disease activity and treatment efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02565225 . Registered on September 16, 2015 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsRheumatologyDocumentationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSmartphoneDigital healthElectronic patient reported outcomesMobile AppsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID33874994
PMCPMC8054360
OpenAlexW3155683645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.