ArticleArthritis research & therapy2021
Mobile App-based documentation of patient-reported outcomes - 3-months results from a proof-of-concept study on modern rheumatology patient management.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02565225 (Mobile Medically Supervised Patient Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using DocuMed.rh and RheumaLive App), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mobile Medically Supervised Patient Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using DocuMed.rh and RheumaLive App
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis With a Digital Health Application: A Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Smartphone-Assisted Patient-Initiated Care Versus Usual Care in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Low Disease Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Trial
- Barriers and Enablers to Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data in Shared Decision-Making From Health Care Professional and Patient Perspectives: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Post-stroke rehabilitation in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: outcome measures, digital tools, and patient education perspectives.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- An Intelligent Interactive Management Platform for Rheumatoid Arthritis Care: Real-World Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- The Impact of Patient-Generated Health Data From Mobile Health Technologies on Health Care Management and Clinical Decision-Making: Narrative Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Predictors of adherence to a digital health application in patients with inflammatory arthritis: retrospective analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Tracking Chronic Diseases via Mobile Health Applications: Which User Experience Aspects Are Key?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- European advances in digital rheumatology: explainable insights and personalized digital health tools for psoriatic arthritis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Improved clinical care and capacity through an integrated electronic patient-reported outcome measure and health record system in inflammatory arthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Assessment of Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Increases in Pain and Their Relationship to Functional Declines and Medication Changes.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- The real experience of reporting electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis and factors influencing participation: a scoping review.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a hybrid telehealth care pathway for patients with axial spondyloarthritis including self-sampling at home: results of a longitudinal proof-of-concept mixed-methods study (TeleSpactive).Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Fabry App: the value of a portable technology in recording day-to-day patient monitored information in patients with Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Two years of approved digital health applications in Germany - Perspectives and experiences of general practitioners with an affinity for their use.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Feasibility of PROMIS using computerized adaptive testing during inpatient rehabilitation.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2023Review
- Attitudes towards technology supported rheumatoid arthritis care: investigating patient- and clinician-perceived opportunities and barriers.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023Article
- Involving patients in the process: Development of a constipation patient-reported outcome measure for symptoms and quality of life.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile medical applications (Apps) offer innovative solutions for patients' self-monitoring and new patient management opportunities. Prior to routine clinical application feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using an App that includes electronic (e) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) warrant evaluation. Therefore, we performed a proof-of-concept study in which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients used an App (RheumaLive) to document their disease.
methodsAccurate PROM reporting via an App in comparison to paper-based versions was investigated to exclude media bias. Sixty participants recruited from 268 consecutive RA outpatients completed paper-based and electronic PROMs (Hannover Functional Questionnaire/derived HAQ; modified RA disease activity index) using the App at baseline and follow-up visits. Between visits, patients used their App on their own smartphone according to their preferences. The equivalence of PROM data and user experiences from patients and physicians were evaluated.
resultsPatients' (78.3% female) mean (SD) age was 50.1 (13.1) years, disease duration 10.5 (9.1) years, and paper-based HAQ 0.78 (0.59). Mean confidence in Apps scored 3.5 (1.1, Likert scale 1 to 6). ePROMs' scores obtained by patients' data entry in the App were equivalent to paper-based ones and preferred by the patients. After 3 months, the App retention rate was 71.7%. Patients' overall satisfaction with the App was 2.2 (0.9, Likert scale 1 to 6). Patients and physicians valued the App, i.e., for patient-physician interaction: 87% reported that it was easier for them to document the course of the disease using the App than "only" answering questions about their current health during routine outpatient visits. Further App use was recommended in 77.3% of the patients, and according to physicians, in seven patients, the App use contributed to an increased adherence to therapy.
conclusionOur study provides an essential basis for the broader implementation of medical Apps in routine care. We demonstrated the feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using a smartphone App in RA. App use was convincing as a reliable option to perform continuous, remote monitoring of disease activity and treatment efficacy.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02565225 . Registered on September 16, 2015 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.