Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33874959›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2021

Interprofessional collaboration and barriers among health and social workers caring for older adults: a Philippine case study.

T J Robinson T Moncatar, Keiko Nakamura, Kathryn Lizbeth L Siongco, Kaoruko Seino, Rebecca Carlson, Carmelita C Canila, Richard S Javier, Fely Marilyn E Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T J Robinson T MoncatarDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Division of Public Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Keiko NakamuraDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Division of Public Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan. nakamura.ith@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9119-4730
Kathryn Lizbeth L SiongcoDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Division of Public Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Kaoruko SeinoDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Division of Public Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Rebecca CarlsonInstitute of Global Affairs, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Carmelita C CanilaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, 1000, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Richard S JavierDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, 1000, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Fely Marilyn E LorenzoDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, 1000, Metro Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited information on how the barriers to interprofessional collaboration (IPC) across various professionals, organizations, and care facilities influence the health and welfare of older adults. This study aimed to describe the status of IPC practices among health and social workers providing care for older adults in the Philippines; investigate the perceived barriers to its implementation and perceived effects on geriatric care; and identify possible solutions to address the barriers limiting collaborative practice.

methodsA case study approach was utilized employing 12 semi-structured in-depth interviews and 29 focus group discussions with care workers from selected primary health care units, public and private hospitals, and nursing homes that are directly involved in geriatric care delivery in two cities in the Philippines. Overall, 174 health and social workers consented to participate in this study. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive thematic analysis using NVivo 12® was used to identify and categorize relevant thematic codes.

resultsInterprofessional geriatric care provided by health and social workers was observed to be currently limited to ad hoc communications typically addressing only administrative concerns. This limitation is imposed by a confluence of barriers such as personal values and beliefs, organizational resource constraints, and a silo system care culture which practitioners say negatively influences care delivery. This in turn results in inability of care providers to access adequate care information, as well as delays and renders inaccessible available care provided to vulnerable older adults. Uncoordinated care of older adults also led to reported inefficient duplication and overlap of interventions.

conclusionGeriatric care workers fear such barriers may aggravate the increasing unmet needs of older adults. In order to address these potential negative outcomes, establishing a clear and committed system of governance that includes IPC is perceived as necessary to install a cohesive service delivery mechanism and provide holistic care for older adults. Future studies are needed to measure the effects of identified barriers on the potential of IPC to facilitate an integrated health and social service delivery system for the improvement of quality of life of older adults in the Philippines.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSocial WorkersAgedDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPhilippinesQualitative ResearchHealth and social careHuman resources for healthInterprofessional collaborationOlder adultsPhilippinesQualitative researchService delivery

Identifiers

PMID33874959
PMCPMC8056548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.