Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33874884›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2021

Impact of erenumab on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization among migraine patients: a US claims database study.

Stewart J Tepper, Juanzhi Fang, Pamela Vo, Ying Shen, Lujia Zhou, Ahmad Abdrabboh, Mrudula Glassberg, Matias Ferraris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Relative Value of Anti-Obesity Medications Compared to Similar Therapies.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stewart J TepperGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Juanzhi FangNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. jenny.fang@novartis.com.
Pamela VoNovartis Pharma AG, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Ying ShenKMK Consulting Inc., Morristown, NJ, USA.
Lujia ZhouKMK Consulting Inc., Morristown, NJ, USA.
Ahmad AbdrabbohNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Mrudula GlassbergNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Matias FerrarisNovartis Pharma AG, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHDartmouth College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. This study aimed to evaluate real-world evidence on the impact of erenumab on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among migraine patients.

methodsThis retrospective effectiveness study utilized the US Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database to identify migraine patients initiating erenumab between May 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Patients had to be at least 18 years old, with a minimum of three doses for erenumab in the 6-month post-index period and continuous medical/pharmacy coverage in the 12-month pre- and 6-month post-index period. The date of the first claim for erenumab served as the index date. Use of acute medications overall and at different drug class level, and HCRU were compared during the 6-month pre- vs. post-index period. Impact of erenumab on a composite endpoint of three possible events: 1) outpatient visit with a diagnosis of migraine and an associated acute medication claim within 7 days of the visit, 2) hospital admission with a primary diagnosis for migraine, or 3) emergency room visit with a primary diagnosis for migraine (any events that occurred ≤3 days apart were counted only once) was also evaluated.

resultsThe analysis included 3171 identified patients. At 6 months, following initiation of erenumab, acute medication use including the number of types of acute medication, number of claims of each medication and % of patients who received acute medication, and HCRU were significantly decreased. For the composite outcome, the mean number of events decreased from 1.03 to 0.77 (rate ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.79; P < 0.0001). A decrease in the proportion of patients with any of the three events was also observed (52.7% vs. 39.5%, P < 0.0001).

conclusionIn this retrospective analysis, erenumab was associated with significantly reduced acute medication use and HCRU in a real-world setting, hence significantly reducing the burden of the disease. A composite endpoint could be used as a proxy to evaluate the burden of migraine attacks; however, further research is needed.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAdolescentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabBurdenEfficacyErenumabHealth care resource utilizationMigrainePreventive therapiesReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID33874884
PMCPMC8054394
OpenAlexW3157009111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.