Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33873758›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2004

High rooting frequency and functional analysis of GUS and GFP expression in transgenic Medicago truncatula A17.

Xin Zhou, Mahesh B Chandrasekharan, Timothy C Hall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent Advances in Medicago truncatula Genomics.International journal of plant genomics · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin ZhouInstitute of Developmental and Molecular Biology and Department of Biology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3155, USA.
Mahesh B ChandrasekharanInstitute of Developmental and Molecular Biology and Department of Biology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3155, USA.
Timothy C HallInstitute of Developmental and Molecular Biology and Department of Biology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3155, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•  An effective transformation method is described for Medicago truncatula A17, verifying its suitability as a model legume for functional genomics. •  Media and culture methods are detailed that yielded an average frequency of 35% for recovery of transgenic shoots from cotyledonary node explants and 39% for root induction and regeneration of entire plants from 419 phosphinothricin-resistant shoots. •  Fertile plants transgenic for both 35S-GFP and phas-GUS were obtained in five of eight independent experiments. The presence and stable inheritance of transgenes was confirmed by GFP or GUS expression and by genomic DNA blots. GFP expression driven by the normally constitutive CaMV 35S promoter diminished as the leaves matured. Although GUS was very strongly and uniformly expressed in seed cotyledons of most lines, one line exhibited an aberrant, patchy pattern. Additionally, weak GUS expression was evident in leaf veins from the normally stringently spatially regulated phas promoter. •  Stably transformed, fertile, M. truncatula A17 plants were generated. The unconventional expression patterns for 35S-GFP and phas-GUS expression obtained in some transformants suggest the occurrence of novel epigenetic events.

Indexed as

35SlegumeMedicagophaseolinrootingtransformation

Identifiers

PMID33873758
OpenAlexW2023403405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.