Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33873653›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2003

Mitochondrial dynamics.

David C Logan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Endosymbiosis, cell evolution, and speciation.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2005
    Article
  14. Frequent fusion and fission of plant mitochondria with unequal nucleoid distribution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C LoganSchool of Biology, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.
University of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria cannot be created de novo but instead must arise from the fission (division) of a parental organelle. In addition to fission, mitochondria also fuse with one another and it is thought that a co-ordinated balance of these two processes controls mitochondrial shape, size and number. In the past 5-7 yr, molecular genetics coupled to state-of-the-art cell biology, in particular the use of mitochondrial-targeted green fluorescent protein (GFP), has enabled identification of proteins controlling mitochondrial shape, size and number in yeast and mammalian cells. Little is known about higher plant mitochondrial dynamics. Recently, however, several genes involved in the control of plant mitochondrial dynamics have been identified. The aim of this article is to bring together what is known about mitochondrial dynamics in any organisms and to relate this to our recent knowledge of the underlying processes in higher plants. Contents Summary 463 I. Introduction 464 II. Mitochondrial evolution 464 III. Mitochondria and the cytoskeleton 465 IV. Mitochondrial morphology, biogenesis, proliferation and inheritance 466 V. Mitochondrial fission and fusion 468 VI. Mitochondrial distribution 470 VII. Plant specific proteins playing a role in mitochondrial dynamics 470 VIII. Conclusions 471 Acknowledgements 475 References 475.

Indexed as

developmentdivisiondynamicsfissionfusionmitochondriamorphology

Identifiers

PMID33873653
OpenAlexW4211055535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.