Poplar genomics comes of age.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Chromosome painting and comparative physical mapping of the sex chromosomes in Populus tomentosa and Populus deltoides.Chromosoma · 2018
   Article
2. Comparison of the physiological effects and transcriptome responses of Populus simonii under different abiotic stresses.Plant molecular biology · 2014
   Article
3. Identification and characterization of nuclear genes involved in photosynthesis in Populus.BMC plant biology · 2014
   Article
4. Comprehensive analysis of CCCH zinc finger family in poplar (Populus trichocarpa).BMC genomics · 2012
   Article
5. Alcohol-inducible gene expression in transgenic Populus.Plant cell reports · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as