ReviewThe New phytologist2003
Fusarium oxysporum and its biocontrol.
Review in The New phytologist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 517 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure and Functional Characteristics Associated withBiology · 2026Article
- Towards a Phylogenomic Framework for theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of physiological and molecular responses to stress of lilies (genusHorticulture research · 2026Article
- Agent-based model for simulating microbial movement with a preferred target for agricultural biologicals.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Has the Striga problem been solved? A field perspective critique of recent progress.Pest management science · 2026Review
- The dual nature ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Apple replant disease: unraveling the fungal enigma hidden in the rhizosphere.Stress biology · 2025Article
- Banana genotype-associated microbiomes play an essential role in suppressing Fusarium wilt.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Bioprospecting bioactive metabolites from Aspergillus fumigatus: identification, culture optimization, spectroscopic profiling, and evaluation of antifungal and antioxidant potential.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Esterase and Peroxidase Are Involved in the Transformation of Chitosan Films by the FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Physiological Responses of Asparagus Plants to Soil Disinfection Strategies Targeting Asparagus Decline Syndrome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The efficacy of nanoparticles on soil microbial biodiversity and the prevention of Fusarium wilt disease (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici).BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Fungicide resistance in Fusarium species: exploring environmental impacts and sustainable management strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Genome-wide identification of the GLK transcription factor family in melon and its expression analysis under biotic and abiotic stresses.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- FoCup, a secreted protein, is essential for virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Development of Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Biocontrol Agents Inhibit Banana Fusarium Wilt and Alter the Rooted Soil Bacterial Community in the Field.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fusarium oxysporum is well represented among the rhizosphere microflora. While all strains exist saprophytically, some are well-known for inducing wilt or root rots on plants whereas others are considered as nonpathogenic. Several methods based on phenotypic and genetic traits have been developed to characterize F. oxysporum strains. Results showed the great diversity affecting the soil-borne populations of F. oxysporum. In suppressive soils, interactions between pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains result in the control of the disease. Therefore nonpathogenic strains are developed as biocontrol agents. The nonpathogenic F. oxysporum strains show several modes of action contributing to their biocontrol capacity. They are able to compete for nutrients in the soil, affecting the rate of chlamydospore germination of the pathogen. They can also compete for infection sites on the root, and can trigger plant defence reactions, inducing systemic resistance. These mechanisms are more or less important depending on the strain. The nonpathogenic F. oxysporum are easy to mass produce and formulate, but application conditions for biocontrol efficacy under field conditions have still to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.