Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33873028›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2021

Randomized controlled trial of group motivational interviewing for veterans with substance use disorders.

Elizabeth J Santa Ana, Steven D LaRowe, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Antonio A Morgan-Lopez, Kayla Lamb, Katherine A Beavis, Kinfe Bishu, Steve Martino

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. How to Combat the Global Opioid Crisis.CPQ neurology and psychology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth J Santa AnaHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. Electronic address: santaana@musc.edu.
Steven D LaRoweMental Health Service Line, James H. Quillen VAMC, 53 Memorial Ave, Johnson City, TN, 37684, USA.
Mulugeta GebregziabherHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Antonio A Morgan-LopezBehavioral Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Morrisville, NC, 27709, USA.
Kayla LambHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA.
Katherine A BeavisHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA.
Kinfe BishuHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA; Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Steve MartinoYale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 40 Temple St., New Haven, CT, 06510, USA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · USJames H. Quillen VA Medical Center · USRTI International · USYale University · US

Funding

CSRD VA CDA-2-016-08S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivational interviewing delivered in a group format is understudied yet promising as a treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). We evaluated the efficacy of group motivational interviewing (GMI) relative to a treatment-control (TCC) for enhancing treatment and self-help engagement and decreasing alcohol and drug use among veterans with SUD and co-existing psychiatric disorders.

methodVeterans (n = 118) with alcohol use disorder were recruited within an outpatient SUD treatment program and randomized to GMI or TCC upon program entry. Alcohol use, SUD treatment, and 12-step session attendance were primary outcomes. Drug use days was the secondary outcome. Participants were assessed at baseline and at one-and three-month follow-up.

resultsSignificant differences were observed between GMI and TCC for binge drinking at both one (RR = .74; 95 % CI [.58, .94]) and three-month follow-up (RR = .74; 95 % CI [.59, .91]). At three-month follow-up, significant differences between treatment conditions were observed for alcohol use days (RR = .79; 95 % CI [.67, .94]), number of SUD treatment sessions (RR = 2.53; 95 % CI [1.99, 3.22]), and 12-step sessions attended (RR = 1.64; 95 % CI [1.35-1.98]). Similarly, we observed significant effects for GMI on reducing alcohol consumption in standard drinks (RR = .49; 95 % CI [.25, .95]). Drug use days declined at each follow-up, with no significant differences between treatment conditions.

conclusionsGMI delivered at SUD treatment program entry enhanced treatment session and 12-step group attendance and lowered alcohol consumption among outpatient Veterans. Future research should study how GMI works and its effectiveness in SUD treatment settings.

Indexed as

AlcoholismMotivational InterviewingSubstance-Related DisordersVeteransAlcohol DrinkingHumansDual diagnosisGroup treatmentMotivational interviewingSubstance use disordersTreatment engagementVeterans

Identifiers

PMID33873028
PMCPMC9011162
OpenAlexW3152537842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.