ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2021
Superparamagnetic iron oxide-gold nanoparticles conjugated with porous coordination cages: Towards controlled drug release for non-invasive neuroregeneration.
Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Machine Learning-Enhanced PBPK Models for Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery via Nanocarriers: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Multifunctional quantum dot-decorated drug-loaded magnetite nanosystem for dual optical-magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges of Magneto-Plasmonic Nanoparticles under Remote Magnetic and Light Stimulation for Brain-Tissue and Cellular Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Magnetic Fields and Magnetically Stimulated Gold-Coated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Differentially Modulate L-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Activity in Midbrain Neurons.ACS applied nano materials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reports a smart intracellular nanocarrier for sustainable and controlled drug release in non-invasive neuroregeneration. The nanocarrier is composed by superparamagnetic iron oxide-gold (SPIO-Au) core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) conjugated with porous coordination cages (PCCs) through the thiol-containing molecules as bridges. The negatively charged PCC-2 and positively charged PCC-3 are compared for intracellular targeting. Both types result in intracellular targeting via direct penetration across cellular membranes. However, the pyrene (Py)-PEG-SH bridge enabled functionalization of SPIO-Au NPs with PCC-3 exhibits higher interaction with PC-12 neuron-like cells, compared with the rhodamine B (RhB)-PEG-SH bridge enabled case and the stand-alone SPIO-Au NPs. With neglectable toxicities to PC-12 cells, the proposed SPIO-Au-RhB(Py)-PCC-2(3) nanocarriers exhibit effective drug loading capacity of retinoic acid (RA) at 13.505 μg/mg of RA/NPs within 24 h. A controlled release of RA is achieved by using a low-intensity 525 nm LED light (100% compared to 40% for control group within 96 h).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.