Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33872581›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2021

Haemoglobin thresholds to define anaemia in a national sample of healthy children and adolescents aged 1-19 years in India: a population-based study.

Harshpal Singh Sachdev, Akash Porwal, Rajib Acharya, Sana Ashraf, Sowmya Ramesh, Nizamuddin Khan, Umesh Kapil, Anura V Kurpad, Avina Sarna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Annals of global health · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence of Vitamin BNutrients · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harshpal Singh SachdevPaediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: hpssachdev@gmail.com.
Akash PorwalPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
Rajib AcharyaPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sana AshrafPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sowmya RameshPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
Nizamuddin KhanPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
Umesh KapilDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anura V KurpadDepartment of Physiology, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Avina SarnaPopulation Council, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India.
India Habitat Centre · INPopulation Council · INSt.John's Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CRC/19/1/610006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWHO's haemoglobin cutoffs to define anemia were based on five studies of predominantly White adult populations, done over 50 years ago. Therefore, a general re-examination of the existing haemoglobin cutoffs is warranted for global application, in representative healthy populations of children and adults. Such data are scarce in low-income and middle-income countries; however, a 2019, large-scale, nationally representative survey of children and adolescents aged 0-19 years in India (Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey [CNNS]) offered an opportunity for this re-examination. Using this survey, we aimed to assess the age-specific and sex-specific percentiles of haemoglobin and cutoffs to define anaemia in the CNNS population.

methodsFor this population-based study, we constructed age-specific and sex-specific haemoglobin percentiles from values reported for a defined healthy population in the CNNS, which used rigorous quality control measures during sample collection and in the laboratory analyses. To obtain a healthy population, we excluded participants with iron, folate, vitamin B12, and retinol deficiencies; inflammation; variant haemoglobins (haemoglobin A

findingsBetween Feb 24, 2016, and Oct 26, 2018, the CNNS survey collected blood samples from 49 486 individuals. 41 210 participants had a haemoglobin value, 8087 of whom were included in our study and comprised the primary analytical sample. Compared with existing WHO cutoffs, the study cutoffs for haemoglobin were lower at all ages, usually by 1-2 g/dL, but more so in children of both sexes aged 1-2 years and in girls aged 10 years or older. Aanemia prevalence with the study cutoffs was 19·2 percentage points lower than with WHO cutoffs in the entire CNNS sample with valid haemoglobin values across all ages and sexes (10·8% with study cutoffs vs 30·0% with WHO cutoffs).

interpretationThese findings support the re-examination of WHO haemoglobin cutoffs to define anaemia. Our haemoglobin reference percentiles, derived from healthy participants in a large representative Indian survey, are suitable for national use in India. Substantial variations in the 5th percentile of haemoglobin values across the 1-19 years age range and between sexes argue against constructing common cutoffs in stratified age groups for convenience.

fundingNone. TRANSLATIONS: For the Hindi, Punjabi, Tamil and Kannada translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnemiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHemoglobinsHumansIndiaInfantMaleReference ValuesYoung AdultHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID33872581
PMCPMC7612991
OpenAlexW3154276625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.