Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33872332›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Openness Toward Organizational Change Scale (OTOCS): Validity evidence from Brazil and Portugal.

Jorge Sinval, Vernon Miller, João Marôco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorge SinvalWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2855-1360
Vernon MillerDepartment of Communication and Department of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
João MarôcoWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9214-5378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Openness toward organizational change is central to employees' responses to organizations' strategic actions. This study aims to assess the validity evidence of the Openness Toward Organizational Change Scale (OTOCS) by examining the internal structure of the measure (e.g., dimensionality, reliability, measurement invariance) and its relations with other variables such as quality of work life, burnout, job satisfaction, and work engagement. A cross-sectional study was conducted using total sample of 1,175 workers, with 565 workers from Portugal and 610 from Brazil. The data provided satisfactory validity evidence based on the internal structure: the expected dimensionality was confirmed, acceptable levels of reliability were found, and measurement invariance was achieved among countries and sex. The measure also demonstrated satisfactory validity evidence based on the relations to other variables, being negatively associated with burnout and positively associated with work engagement, job satisfaction and quality of work. The OTOCS proved to be a relatively short self-report measure with satisfactory validity evidence to be used among Brazilian and Portuguese workers.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationAdultBrazilBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWork Engagement

Identifiers

PMID33872332
PMCPMC8055016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.