Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33872049›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of urology2021

Cardiovascular Events in Men with Prostate Cancer Receiving Hormone Therapy: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Kathleen W Zhang, Melissa A Reimers, Adam Christopher Calaway, Michael G Fradley, Lee Ponsky, Jorge A Garcia, Jennifer Cullen, Brian C Baumann, Daniel Addison, Courtney M Campbell and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cardiovascular risk in ADT recipients: does the type of ADT matter?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cardiometabolic Consequences of Targeted Anticancer Therapies.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen W ZhangCardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Melissa A ReimersDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Adam Christopher CalawayDepartment of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael G FradleyCardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lee PonskyDepartment of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jorge A GarciaDivision of Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jennifer CullenDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Brian C BaumannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Daniel AddisonCardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Courtney M CampbellCardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Arjun K GhoshCardio-Oncology Service, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel J LenihanCardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Nihar R DesaiCardiovascular Medicine Section, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Neal WeintraubDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
Avirup GuhaHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
University School · USWashington University in St. Louis · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USAugusta University · USGTx (United States) · USMemorial Health System · USSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USYale University · US

Funding

Epigenetic regulation of HDAC9 in obesity and atherosclerosisR01HL126949 · NHLBI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI WEINTRAUB, NEAL L · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002735 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUMGARDNER, GINNY L, KIRSCHNER, LAWRENCE S · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002735NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe comparative cardiovascular risk profiles of available hormone therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer is not known. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe queried the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, a retrospective, pharmacovigilance database, for cardiovascular adverse event reports in men with prostate cancer receiving gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, androgen receptor antagonists, and/or androgen synthesis inhibitors from January 2000 to April 2020.

resultsCardiovascular adverse events accounted for 6,231 reports (12.6%) on hormone monotherapy and 1,793 reports (26.1%) on combination therapy. Arterial vascular events were reported most commonly, followed by arrhythmias, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism. Compared to GnRH agonists, GnRH antagonists were associated with fewer cardiovascular adverse event reports as monotherapy (adjusted reporting odds ratio [ROR]=0.70 [95% CI 0.59-0.84], p <0.001) and as combination therapy (ROR=0.47 [0.34-0.67], p <0.0001), driven by reductions in arterial vascular events. Second generation androgen receptor antagonists and abiraterone were associated with more reports of hypertension requiring hospitalization (ROR=1.21 [1.03-1.41], p=0.02 and ROR=1.19 [1.01-1.40], p=0.03, respectively), and more heart failure events when used in combination with GnRH antagonists (ROR=2.79 [1.30-6.01], p=0.009 and ROR=2.57 [1.12-5.86], p=0.03).

conclusionsIn this retrospective analysis of a pharmacovigilance database, arterial vascular events were the most commonly reported cardiovascular adverse events in men on hormone therapy for prostate cancer. GnRH antagonists were associated with fewer reports of overall cardiovascular events and arterial vascular events than GnRH agonists. Additional study is needed to identify optimal strategies to reduce cardiovascular morbidity among men with prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHeart FailureHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedabirateroneAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalGonadotropin-Releasing Hormoneandrogen antagonistspharmacovigilanceprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33872049
PMCPMC10243352
OpenAlexW3154795391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.