Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871840›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Longitudinal Studies 1: Determinants of Risk.

Sean W Murphy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outline: The Long-Term Impact of Exercise on Adolescent Growth and Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Wear patterns in knee OA correlate with native limb geometry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sean W MurphyDepartment of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. swmurphy@mun.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal or observational study designs are important methodologies to investigate potential associations that may not be amenable to randomized controlled trials. In many cases, they may be performed using existing data and are often cost-effective ways of addressing important questions. The major disadvantage of observational studies is the potential for bias. The absence of randomization means that one can never be certain that unknown confounders are present, and specific studies designs have their own inherent forms of bias. Careful study design may minimize bias. Establishing casual association based on observational methods requires due consideration of the quality of the individual study and knowledge of their limitations.

Indexed as

Longitudinal StudiesResearch DesignBiasHumansObservational Studies as TopicRisk FactorsSample SizeBiasCase–control studyCohort studyLongitudinal studiesRisk factorsSample size estimate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.