ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Biotreatment of Cr(VI) and pyrene combined water pollution by loofa-immobilized bacteria.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and pyrene are toxic pollutants that are difficult to remediate from soils and wastewater. Serratia sp. strains have been previously demonstrated to remove either Cr(VI) or pyrene and here a new isolate, called the Z6 strain, was demonstrated to remove both simultaneously. The removal occurs primarily by Cr(VI) reduction and pyrene biodegradation, and genome analysis suggests the removal mechanisms are the putative chromate reductase and two assumable pathways of pyrene degradation. The Z6 strain effectively removed most Cr(VI) (up to approximately 86%) and pyrene (up to approximately 57%) in seven different types of wastewater after 7 days of biotreatment. Additionally, the carrier loofa used for bacteria immobilization did not change the kinetics of Cr(VI) reduction or pyrene degradation. The carrier loofa was also effective for multiple uses, with removal capacity not being significantly affected over the first seven cycles with the same carrier loofa. These results provide data for developing practical biotreatment applications of Cr(VI) and pyrene contaminated sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.