Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871742›Full record

Trial reportAdministration and policy in mental health2021

The Effect of Intensive Implementation Support on Fidelity for Four Evidence-Based Psychosis Treatments: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Torleif Ruud, Robert E Drake, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Karin Drivenes, Miriam Hartveit, Kristin Heiervang, Tordis S Høifødt, Vegard Ø Haaland, Inge Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271242 (A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271242 completednot on this map

A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled325ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsSystematic implementation support, No implementation support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Torleif RuudDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. torleif.ruud@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-1267
Robert E DrakeWestat, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5180-547X
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-2272
Karin DrivenesDivision of Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-8740
Miriam HartveitSection of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health Trust, Haugesund, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-2236
Kristin HeiervangDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4553-8771
Tordis S HøifødtUniversity Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Vegard Ø HaalandDivision of Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-9163
Inge JoaTIPS Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-2336
Jan Olav JohannessenTIPS Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-8168
Karl Johan JohansenMental Health Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn StensrudDivision of Mental Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
Espen Woldsengen HaugomDivision of Mental Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6953-7987
Hanne ClausenDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-6918
Eva BiringerSection of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health Trust, Haugesund, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0933-1079
Gary R BondWestat, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-9823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeService providers need effective strategies to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) with high fidelity. This study aimed to evaluate an intensive implementation support strategy to increase fidelity to EBP standards in treatment of patients with psychosis.

methodsThe study used a cluster randomized design with pairwise assignment of practices within each of 39 Norwegian mental health clinics. Each site chose two of four practices for implementation: physical health care, antipsychotic medication management, family psychoeducation, illness management and recovery. One practice was assigned to the experimental condition (toolkits, clinical training, implementation facilitation, data-based feedback) and the other to the control condition (manual only). The outcome measure was fidelity to the EBP, measured at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months, analyzed using linear mixed models and effect sizes.

resultsThe increase in fidelity scores (within a range 1-5) from baseline to 18 months was significantly greater for experimental sites than for control sites for the combined four practices, with mean difference in change of 0.86 with 95% CI (0.21; 1.50), p = 0.009). Effect sizes for increase in group difference of mean fidelity scores were 2.24 for illness management and recovery, 0.68 for physical health care, 0.71 for antipsychotic medication management, and 0.27 for family psychoeducation. Most improvements occurred during the first 12 months.

conclusionsIntensive implementation strategies (toolkits, clinical training, implementation facilitation, data-based feedback) over 12 months can facilitate the implementation of EBPs for psychosis treatment. The approach may be more effective for some practices than for others.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersEvidence-Based PracticeHumansNorwayEvidence-based practiceFidelity scaleImplementation supportMental health servicesPsychoses

Identifiers

PMID33871742
PMCPMC8363529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.