ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Real-time US/cone-beam CT fusion imaging for percutaneous ablation of small renal tumours: a technical note.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous ablation versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal tumors: outcomes from a pooled analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Renal Arteriography and C-arm CT-Guided Ablation (RenACAGA) for Thermal Ablation of Challenging Renal Tumors.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Robotic CBCT meets robotic ultrasound.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Percutaneous cryoablation in soft tissue tumor management: an educational review.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in interventional radiology: state of the art.European radiology experimental · 2024Review
- Analysis of the Effect of Percutaneous Cone Shaping in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Ultrasound Image Features under Decomposition Algorithm to Analyze the Nursing Intervention on Patients with Colon Polyps Undergoing Endoscopic Resection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Robotics in Interventional Radiology: Review of Current and Future Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFusion imaging is gaining attention as an imaging technique to assist minimally invasive tumour ablation. Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are the most common imaging modalities to guide thermal ablation of renal tumours, yet cone-beam CT (CBCT) has recently been described to successfully assist percutaneous renal interventions. Our goal was to evaluate primary technical success and correct lesion targeting of US/CBCT fusion imaging to guide the ablation of kidney masses < 2 cm in a small group of patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsSix renal lesions (maximum diameter 11-17 mm) were treated with RFA in 5 different patients using real-time US/CBCT. Fusion imaging was used to identify and monitor tumour ablation. Demographics, tumour characteristics and mean serum creatinine levels were recorded before and after the procedure. Primary technical success and correct lesion targeting represented the main endpoints of the study. Primary technique efficacy was confirmed at 1-month and 3-month contrast-enhanced CT follow-ups.
resultsIn all cases, a confident US/CBCT synchronisation was reached and allowed for a correct targeting and a successful percutaneous ablation. Primary technique efficacy was 100%. No recurrence was observed at the follow-up that ranged from 8 to 26 months (mean 16 months).
conclusionsUS/CBCT fusion proved to be a viable method to precisely guide safe and effective percutaneous thermal ablation in patients with small renal tumours, especially when hardly detectable on US. KEY POINTS: • US/CBCT fusion imaging for renal ablation is safe and feasible. • US/CBCT fusion imaging allows for an improved targeting and complete ablation of small RCC with poor US-conspicuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.