Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871691›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2021

Intraoperative mapping of pre-central motor cortex and subcortex: a proposal for supplemental cortical and novel subcortical maps to Penfield's motor homunculus.

Prajwal Ghimire, Jose Pedro Lavrador, Asfand Baig Mirza, Noemia Pereira, Hannah Keeble, Marco Borri, Luciano Furlanetti, Christian Brogna, Jozef Jarosz, Richard Gullan and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prajwal GhimireDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. prajwal.ghimire@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-956X
Jose Pedro LavradorDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Asfand Baig MirzaDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Noemia PereiraNeuromonitoring Team, Inomed Neurocare UK Ltd., London, UK.
Hannah KeebleNeuromonitoring Team, Inomed Neurocare UK Ltd., London, UK.
Marco BorriDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Luciano FurlanettiDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christian BrognaDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jozef JaroszDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard GullanDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Francesco VerganiDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ranjeev BhangooDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Keyoumars AshkanDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penfield's motor homunculus describes a caricaturised yet useful representation of the map of various body parts on the pre-central cortex. We propose a supplemental map of the clinically represented areas of human body in pre-central cortex and a novel subcortical corticospinal tract map. We believe this knowledge is essential for safe surgery in patients with eloquent brain lesions. A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent craniotomy for motor eloquent lesions with intraoperative motor neuromonitoring (cortical and subcortical) between 2015 and 2020 was performed. All positive cortical and subcortical stimulation points were taken into account and cartographic maps were produced to demonstrate cortical and subcortical areas of motor representation and their configuration. A literature review in PubMed was performed. One hundred and eighty consecutive patients (58.4% male, 41.6% female) were included in the study with 81.6% asleep and 18.4% awake craniotomies for motor eloquent lesions (gliomas 80.7%, metastases 13.8%) with intraoperative cortical and subcortical motor mapping. Based on the data, we propose a supplemental clinical cortical and a novel subcortical motor map to the original Penfield's motor homunculus, including demonstration of localisation of intercostal muscles both in the cortex and subcortex which has not been previously described. The supplementary clinical cortical and novel subcortical motor maps of the homunculus presented here have been derived from a large cohort of patients undergoing direct cortical and subcortical brain mapping. The information will have direct relevance for improving the safety and outcome of patients undergoing resection of motor eloquent brain lesions.

Indexed as

Motor CortexBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsElectric StimulationFemaleGliomaHumansMaleOvarian NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTeratomaCorticospinal tractCraniotomyMotor cortexMotor homunculusSubcortical map

Identifiers

PMID33871691
PMCPMC8096772
OpenAlexW3112333826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.