Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871689›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Re-establishment of cavity-nesting bee and wasp communities along a reforestation gradient in southern Amazonia.

Gustavo Júnior de Araújo, Thiago Junqueira Izzo, Danielle Storck-Tonon, Lucas N Paolucci, Raphael K Didham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gustavo Júnior de AraújoDepartamento de Ecologia e Botânica, Laboratório de Ecologia de Comunidades, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78060-900, Brazil. gustavojraraujo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-0819
Thiago Junqueira IzzoDepartamento de Ecologia e Botânica, Laboratório de Ecologia de Comunidades, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78060-900, Brazil.
Danielle Storck-TononPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente e Sistemas de Produção Agrícola, Universidade DO Estado de Mato Grosso, Tangará da Serra, 78300-000, Brazil.
Lucas N PaolucciPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570-900, Brazil.
Raphael K DidhamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.189833/2018-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global initiatives to reforest degraded areas have intensified in recent years, in an attempt to reverse the environmental impacts of habitat loss on species and ecosystem provided by them. However, the effectiveness of such reforestation initiatives in re-establishing biodiversity is still poorly understood. Here, we test how reforestation type and intensity applied to deforested areas affect the reestablishment of communities of cavity-nesting bees and wasps. We deployed experimental trap-nests along a reforestation gradient of increasing structural similarity to primary forest, after 18 years of reforestation. We found that reestablishment, in terms of abundance and richness of both bees and wasps, was greatest at an intermediate point along the reforestation gradient. However, these communities were highly dissimilar to primary forest, and recovery of intact insect community composition was only achieved when reforestation was more similar in structure to natural forests. This effect was more pronounced for bees than for wasps. Our findings suggest that along the reforestation gradient, services provided by wasps will be more easily recovered than those provided by bees. Our results have important implications for the challenges of restoring and maintaining species biodiversity as well as their associated ecosystem services.

Indexed as

WaspsAnimalsBeesBiodiversityBrazilEcosystemForestsEcosystem-servicesForest regeneration gradientPollinationRainforestReforestation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.