ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2022
Stimulant treatment effectiveness, safety and risk for psychosis in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective Effects of Methylphenidate on Attention and Inhibition in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Results From a Clinical Trial.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate an association between stimulant treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in individuals with 22q11.2DS and the development of psychotic disorders, to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of stimulant treatment in individuals with 22q11.2DS compared to individuals with idiopathic ADHD, and to explore effects of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype on 22q11.2DS response to stimulants and risk of side effects. Rates of stimulant use and methylphenidate equivalent exposure were compared among individuals with 22q11.2DS, between 51 with psychotic disorders and a control group of 57 22q11.2DS without psychotic disorders, from Tel Aviv and Geneva. In addition, 44 individuals with 22q11.2DS and ADHD from Tel Aviv who initiated stimulants before age 18 years were compared to a control group of 35 age- and sex-matched controls with idiopathic ADHD, for treatment effectiveness (Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement), and rates of side effects. Stimulant use history and methylphenidate equivalent exposure did not differ among individuals with 22q11.2DS, between those with and without psychotic disorders. The long-term retrospective follow-up (5.3 ± 4.1 years) of stimulant-treated individuals with 22q11.2DS showed a higher rate of significant clinical improvement of ADHD symptoms, compared to idiopathic ADHD individuals (p = 0.013), and similar side effect rates. There was no effect of the COMT genotype on response to stimulants or on any side effects. This preliminary long-term retrospective analysis suggests that stimulant treatment in 22q11.2DS is apparently safe in terms of psychosis conversion and rates of side effects, and that it is effective in alleviating ADHD symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.