ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021
Conservation of Aging and Cancer Epigenetic Signatures across Human and Mouse.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal Cancer Therapy and Accelerated Brain Aging: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Consequences.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals the Potential Role of GZMK+ CD8+ T Cells in Cell Senescence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
- Microglial Replacement Reverses Age-Associated Epigenetic Modifications Despite Accelerating Epigenetic Age.Aging and disease · 2025Article
- The Expression Level of SOX Family Transcription Factors' mRNA as a Diagnostic Marker for Osteoarthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A multiomic atlas of the aging hippocampus reveals molecular changes in response to environmental enrichment.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Elevated SLC3A2 associated with poor prognosis and enhanced malignancy in gliomas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Early results of the integrative epigenomic-transcriptomic landscape of colorectal adenoma and cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- The pharmacoepigenetic paradigm in cancer treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- The Role of SOX Transcription Factors in Ageing and Age-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Aging and cancer epigenetics: Where do the paths fork?Aging cell · 2022Review
- Physical exercise shapes the mouse brain epigenome.Molecular metabolism · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging and cancer are two interrelated processes, with aging being a major risk factor for the development of cancer. Parallel epigenetic alterations have been described for both, although differences, especially within the DNA hypomethylation scenario, have also been recently reported. Although many of these observations arise from the use of mouse models, there is a lack of systematic comparisons of human and mouse epigenetic patterns in the context of disease. However, such comparisons are significant as they allow to establish the extent to which some of the observed similarities or differences arise from pre-existing species-specific epigenetic traits. Here, we have used reduced representation bisulfite sequencing to profile the brain methylomes of young and old, tumoral and nontumoral brain samples from human and mouse. We first characterized the baseline epigenomic patterns of the species and subsequently focused on the DNA methylation alterations associated with cancer and aging. Next, we described the functional genomic and epigenomic context associated with the alterations, and finally, we integrated our data to study interspecies DNA methylation levels at orthologous CpG sites. Globally, we found considerable differences between the characteristics of DNA methylation alterations in cancer and aging in both species. Moreover, we describe robust evidence for the conservation of the specific cancer and aging epigenomic signatures in human and mouse. Our observations point toward the preservation of the functional consequences of these alterations at multiple levels of genomic regulation. Finally, our analyses reveal a role for the genomic context in explaining disease- and species-specific epigenetic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.