ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2021
Progressive Response to Repeat Application of Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comprehensive New Analysis and Clinical Implications.
Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain: an evidence-informed guide for the practicing clinician.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Response to High-Dose Topical Capsaicin in Neuropathic Pain: Absence of Deep Pain as a Predictor of Analgesic Effect.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of a High-Concentration (179 mg) Capsaicin Patch for the Treatment of Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Scotland.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- CASPAR: a retrospective cohort study of the high-concentration capsaicin topical system in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
- Review
- A Review of Nonsurgical Neurolytic Procedures for Neuropathic Pain.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Real-world 12-month outcomes of repeated high-concentration capsaicin patch in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: results from the CASPAR study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Pathophysiology and New Insights into the Mechanism of Action of High-Concentration Topical Capsaicin.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of capsaicin 8% patches: The experience of a rheumatology department.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Topical capsaicin 8% patch in peripheral neuropathic pain: Efficacy and quality of life.British journal of pain · 2024Article
- Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Update on Treating Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Current US Guidelines with a Focus on the Most Recently Approved Management Options.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Topical treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) with high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch in breast cancer patients - results of the QUCIP study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Issues and challenges in diabetic neuropathy management: A narrative review.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Article
- Prevention and Management Strategies for Diabetic Neuropathy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following Breast Cancer: Effectiveness and Tolerability of High-Concentration Capsaicin Patch.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Reversing painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy with the capsaicin 8% patch: Clinical evidence for pain relief and restoration of functionFrontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of repeated application of capsaicin 179 mg cutaneous patch in nonresponders to the first application.
designPost hoc, as-treated analysis of two prospective trials (STRIDE and PACE) with 52-week follow-up. BLINDING: Open-label.
settingMulticenter clinical trial. SUBJECTS: STRIDE: nondiabetic neuropathic pain; PACE: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
methodsPatients were divided according to number of applications needed before attainment of a ≥30% reduction in average pain intensity (question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI-Q5]). We assessed the change from baseline in average pain intensity (BPI-Q5), mean "interference with sleep" score, Patient Global Impression of Change, quality of life (QOL) via the EuroQol 5-dimension, and Self-Assessment of Treatment.
resultsIn STRIDE and PACE, respectively, n = 306 and n = 313 received the capsaicin patch; n = 60 and n = 96 had a response after the first application, n = 33 and n = 68 after the second, and n = 11 and n = 43 after the third. Among patients without a ≥30% reduction in pain intensity at 3 months, in STRIDE and PACE, respectively, 23.3% and 28.1% achieved a ≥30% reduction at 6 months, increasing to 33.9% and 45.7% at 12 months. Similar results were obtained when a decrease of ≥50% was used as the responder definition. Progressive improvements in pain intensity in slower responders reached levels similar to those in early responders at month 12 and were accompanied by improvements in sleep, QOL, and patient satisfaction.
conclusionsAlthough some patients with peripheral neuropathic pain experience rapid improvements with a single treatment of capsaicin 179 mg patch, some may require two or three treatments before an initial response is observed. Similar benefits for pain, sleep, and QOL can be achieved in early and late responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.