Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871641›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Predictive Models of Genetic Redundancy in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Siobhan A Cusack, Peipei Wang, Serena G Lotreck, Bethany M Moore, Fanrui Meng, Jeffrey K Conner, Patrick J Krysan, Melissa D Lehti-Shiu, Shin-Han Shiu

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The unequal functional redundancy of ArabidopsisFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siobhan A CusackCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Peipei WangDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Serena G LotreckDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Bethany M MooreDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-7292
Fanrui MengDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jeffrey K ConnerDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Patrick J KrysanDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Melissa D Lehti-ShiuDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Shin-Han ShiuCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-235X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic redundancy refers to a situation where an individual with a loss-of-function mutation in one gene (single mutant) does not show an apparent phenotype until one or more paralogs are also knocked out (double/higher-order mutant). Previous studies have identified some characteristics common among redundant gene pairs, but a predictive model of genetic redundancy incorporating a wide variety of features derived from accumulating omics and mutant phenotype data is yet to be established. In addition, the relative importance of these features for genetic redundancy remains largely unclear. Here, we establish machine learning models for predicting whether a gene pair is likely redundant or not in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana based on six feature categories: functional annotations, evolutionary conservation including duplication patterns and mechanisms, epigenetic marks, protein properties including posttranslational modifications, gene expression, and gene network properties. The definition of redundancy, data transformations, feature subsets, and machine learning algorithms used significantly affected model performance based on holdout, testing phenotype data. Among the most important features in predicting gene pairs as redundant were having a paralog(s) from recent duplication events, annotation as a transcription factor, downregulation during stress conditions, and having similar expression patterns under stress conditions. We also explored the potential reasons underlying mispredictions and limitations of our studies. This genetic redundancy model sheds light on characteristics that may contribute to long-term maintenance of paralogs, and will ultimately allow for more targeted generation of functionally informative double mutants, advancing functional genomic studies.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationMachine LearningModels, GeneticArabidopsisgenetic redundancymachine learningmolecular evolution

Identifiers

PMID33871641
PMCPMC8321531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.