Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871629›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Evolution after Whole-Genome Duplication: Teleost MicroRNAs.

Thomas Desvignes, Jason Sydes, Jerôme Montfort, Julien Bobe, John H Postlethwait

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Leafy and weedy seadragon genomes connect genic and repetitive DNA features to the extravagant biology of syngnathid fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas DesvignesInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-8785
Jason SydesInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4187-2828
Jerôme MontfortINRAE, LPGP, Rennes, France.
Julien BobeINRAE, LPGP, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9355-8227
John H PostlethwaitInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-2137
University of Oregon · USInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

Resources for Teleost Gene Duplicates and Human DiseaseR01OD011116 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI POSTLETHWAIT, JOHN H. · 2012 to 2020
$5.4M
Mechanisms of Sex Determination in ZebrafishR01GM085318 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI POSTLETHWAIT, JOHN H. · 2010 to 2018
$2.1M
Advancing the Scientific Potential of Transcriptomics in Aquatic ModelsR24OD011199 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CRESKO, WILLIAM A, POSTLETHWAIT, JOHN H. · 2012 to 2014
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085318NIH HHS R01 OD011116NIH HHS R24 OD011199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important gene expression regulators implicated in many biological processes, but we lack a global understanding of how miRNA genes evolve and contribute to developmental canalization and phenotypic diversification. Whole-genome duplication events likely provide a substrate for species divergence and phenotypic change by increasing gene numbers and relaxing evolutionary pressures. To understand the consequences of genome duplication on miRNA evolution, we studied miRNA genes following the teleost genome duplication (TGD). Analysis of miRNA genes in four teleosts and in spotted gar, whose lineage diverged before the TGD, revealed that miRNA genes were retained in ohnologous pairs more frequently than protein-coding genes, and that gene losses occurred rapidly after the TGD. Genomic context influenced retention rates, with clustered miRNA genes retained more often than nonclustered miRNA genes and intergenic miRNA genes retained more frequently than intragenic miRNA genes, which often shared the evolutionary fate of their protein-coding host. Expression analyses revealed both conserved and divergent expression patterns across species in line with miRNA functions in phenotypic canalization and diversification, respectively. Finally, major strands of miRNA genes experienced stronger purifying selection, especially in their seeds and 3'-complementary regions, compared with minor strands, which nonetheless also displayed evolutionary features compatible with constrained function. This study provides the first genome-wide, multispecies analysis of the mechanisms influencing metazoan miRNA evolution after whole-genome duplication.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceFishesGene DuplicationGonadsMicroRNAsMultigene FamilySelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityMicroRNAsarm-switchingblackfin icefish Chaenocephalus aceratusJapanese medaka Oryzias latipesspotted gar Lepisosteus oculatusthree-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatuszebrafish Danio rerio

Identifiers

PMID33871629
PMCPMC8321539
OpenAlexW3155012005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.