Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871606›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Reverse Plasticity Underlies Rapid Evolution by Clonal Selection within Populations of Fibroblasts Propagated on a Novel Soft Substrate.

Purboja Purkayastha, Kavya Pendyala, Ayush S Saxena, Hesamedin Hakimjavadi, Srikar Chamala, Purushottam Dixit, Charles F Baer, Tanmay P Lele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic variation drives cancer cell adaptation to ECM stiffness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Purboja PurkayasthaArtie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-161X
Kavya PendyalaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Ayush S SaxenaDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-3905
Hesamedin HakimjavadiUniversity of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Srikar ChamalaUniversity of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Purushottam DixitUniversity of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charles F BaerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0140-5814
Tanmay P LeleArtie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Determination of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations in C. elegansR01GM107227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BAER, CHARLES F · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical properties such as substrate stiffness are a ubiquitous feature of a cell's environment. Many types of animal cells exhibit canonical phenotypic plasticity when grown on substrates of differing stiffness, in vitro and in vivo. Whether such plasticity is a multivariate optimum due to hundreds of millions of years of animal evolution, or instead is a compromise between conflicting selective demands, is unknown. We addressed these questions by means of experimental evolution of populations of mouse fibroblasts propagated for approximately 90 cell generations on soft or stiff substrates. The ancestral cells grow twice as fast on stiff substrate as on soft substrate and exhibit the canonical phenotypic plasticity. Soft-selected lines derived from a genetically diverse ancestral population increased growth rate on soft substrate to the ancestral level on stiff substrate and evolved the same multivariate phenotype. The pattern of plasticity in the soft-selected lines was opposite of the ancestral pattern, suggesting that reverse plasticity underlies the observed rapid evolution. Conversely, growth rate and phenotypes did not change in selected lines derived from clonal cells. Overall, our results suggest that the changes were the result of genetic evolution and not phenotypic plasticity per se. Whole-transcriptome analysis revealed consistent differentiation between ancestral and soft-selected populations, and that both emergent phenotypes and gene expression tended to revert in the soft-selected lines. However, the selected populations appear to have achieved the same phenotypic outcome by means of at least two distinct transcriptional architectures related to mechanotransduction and proliferation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionSelection, GeneticAnimalsFibroblastsGene ExpressionGenetic DriftMechanotransduction, CellularMiceNIH 3T3 Cellsevolutionary cell biologyexperimental evolutiongene expressionmechanotransductionphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID33871606
PMCPMC8321517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.