Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871548›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2021

Communicating uncertainty: contrasting the communication experiences of patients with advanced COPD and incurable lung cancer.

Nothando Ngwenya, Clare Crang, Morag Farquhar, Robert C Rintoul, Ravi Mahadeva, Lori D Calvert, Scott A Murray, Stephen Barclay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nothando NgwenyaSocial Science and Research Ethics Department, Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5630-6389
Clare CrangPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Morag FarquharSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Robert C RintoulDepartment of Oncology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Ravi MahadevaRespiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Lori D CalvertNorth West Anglia Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Scott A MurrayPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen BarclayPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBPeterborough City Hospital · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the uncertain disease trajectory and variable rate of progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), health care professionals (HCPs) are challenged in explaining what the future may hold for patients compared to those with lung cancer (LC). Support and communication of timely information can significantly improve health outcomes.

objectiveThis study sought to identify factors that impact communication and support and recommend ways to improve patients' understanding of living with life-threatening illness.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with patients with LC (n = 22) and advanced COPD (n = 18), their informal carers (21 LC and 18 COPD) and HCPs (n = 51). Patients were recruited from primary and secondary care in the East of England, UK, during 2010-12.

resultsDirectness and clarity characterized communication in LC, whereas uncertainty and limited explanations predominated in COPD. Discussions on how the disease might impact on decisions and preferences to be made in the future were less common in COPD. Information for LC patients was mainly from hospital clinicians and any information for COPD patients mainly from primary care clinicians.

conclusionsThe experience of COPD patients could be improved by professionals soon after diagnosis explaining to them the typical pattern of decline in COPD, highlighting the inherent uncertainties about when exacerbations and death may occur. This conversation should lead to planning for the different challenges that the patient and informal carer recognize as most important to them. This contrasts with the 'breaking bad news' conversation that oncologists are highly trained to deliver.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCommunicationHumansPalliative CareUncertaintyAdvance care planningchronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)health communicationlung cancerprimary health careuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33871548
PMCPMC8604275
OpenAlexW3154293614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.