Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871395›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021

Fecal microbiota profile in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Taiwan.

Tien-En Chang, Jiing-Chyuan Luo, Ueng-Cheng Yang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Ming-Chih Hou, Fa-Yauh Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tien-En ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Jiing-Chyuan LuoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Ueng-Cheng YangNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Hsiang HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Ming-Chih HouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Fa-Yauh LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with complicated interaction between immune, gut microbiota, and environmental factors in a genetically vulnerable host. Dysbiosis is often seen in patients with IBD. We aimed to investigate the fecal microbiota in patients with IBD and compared them with a control group in Taiwan.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we investigated fecal microbiota in 20 patients with IBD and 48 healthy controls. Fecal samples from both IBD patients and controls were analyzed by the next-generation sequencing method and relevant software.

resultsThe IBD group showed lower bacterial richness and diversity compared with the control group. The principal coordinate analysis also revealed the significant structural differences between the IBD group and the control group. These findings were consistent whether the analysis was based on an operational taxonomic unit or amplicon sequence variant. However, no significant difference was found when comparing the composition of fecal microbiota between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Further analysis showed that Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Bifidobacterium were dominant in the IBD group, whereas Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum were dominant in the control group at the genus level. When comparing UC, CD, and control group, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus were identified as dominant genera in the UC group. Fusobacterium and Escherichia_Shigella were dominant in the CD group.

conclusionCompared with the healthy control, the IBD group showed dysbiosis with a significant decrease in both richness and diversity of gut microbiota.

Indexed as

FecesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID33871395
PMCPMC12966102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.