Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871308›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2021

Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching.

Emmanuelle Motte-Signoret, Antoine Labbé, Grégoire Benoist, Agnès Linglart, Vincent Gajdos, Alexandre Lapillonne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmanuelle Motte-SignoretUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-4420
Antoine LabbéUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, UFR Simone Veil Santé, 78180, Montigny le Bretonneux, France.
Grégoire BenoistUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, UFR Simone Veil Santé, 78180, Montigny le Bretonneux, France.
Agnès LinglartUniversité Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Vincent GajdosDepartment of Pediatrics, CHU A. Paré, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Alexandre LapillonneUniversité de Paris, UFR Médecine Santé, 75006, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to adapt curricula in the next few years. An anonymous cross-sectional survey of medical students, pediatric residents, neonatal fellows, and their respective teachers was conducted between June and August 2020 to assess feelings about quality, attendance, equivalence, and sustainability of online teaching programs. 146 Students and 26 teachers completed the survey. 89% of students agreed that the offered online teaching was an appropriate way of teaching during the pandemic. Less than half of learners and teachers felt they have received or provided a training of an equivalent level and quality as in usual courses. About one-third thought that this online teaching should continue after the crisis ends. Medical school students had significantly more mixed opinions on online teaching than residents and fellows did. Attendance of learners significantly improved with synchronous online classes (p < 0.001), and among more advanced learners (p < 0.002). Our study is the first of this kind to assess simultaneously the feelings of learners at different levels (medical students, residents, and fellows) and their respective teachers of pediatric on programs taught online. It showed that online programs were perceived as appropriate ways of teaching during the COVID pandemic. Further studies are, however, needed to assess the efficacy of such teaching methods on medical skills and communication capabilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, MedicalFaculty, MedicalFemaleFranceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Students, Medicalhealth crisismedical educationOnline teachingstudents’ opinionteachers’ opinion

Identifiers

PMID33871308
PMCPMC8079026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.