Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871079›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Endoscopy training in COVID-19: Challenges and hope for a better age.

Chieh Sian Koo, Kewin Tien Ho Siah, Calvin Jianyi Koh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Review
  9. Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopy training in COVID-19: Challenges and hope for a better age.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chieh Sian KooDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-8186
Kewin Tien Ho SiahDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-5101
Calvin Jianyi KohDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-3737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is a unique challenge that has disrupted endoscopy training. Initial infection control measures aimed at protecting patients and staff meant nonessential endoscopic activity was suspended in many countries. The decrease in elective caseload from the pandemic also reduced training numbers during this period. While hands-on training took a backseat, more efforts were directed to didactic training of cognitive competencies. We review the literature describing the impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy training and summarize key measures aimed at mitigating this effect. These include leveraging on web-based didactic material and video-conferences, increased use of simulation and models to hone technical competencies, and a shift in focus from numbers-based accreditation to competency-based accreditation. While COVID-19 was hoped to be short-lived, it is clear the impact is long-lasting. Hence, it is crucial for training programs to take stock of how endoscopy training is evolving and use this opportunity to implement new paradigms into their endoscopic training curricula. COVID-19 might just be the catalyst that transforms endoscopy training into a new digital era.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Education, MedicalEndoscopyGastroenterologyHumansCOVID-19educationendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID33871079
PMCPMC8251278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.