ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2021
Recurrence of previous chilblain lesions during the second wave of COVID-19: can we still doubt the correlation with SARS-CoV-2?
Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding COVID-19 in children: immune determinants and post-infection conditions.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- A clinicopathological description of COVID-19-induced chilblains (COVID-toes) correlated with a published literature review.Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2022Review
- Cutaneous and Allergic reactions due to COVID-19 vaccinations: A review.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Review
- Long-term Outcome of Chilblains Associated with SARS-CoV-2.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2021Article
- Type I interferon response and vascular alteration in chilblain-like lesions during the COVID-19 outbreak.The British journal of dermatology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.