Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33871017›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Incorporating real-world evidence into the development of patient blood glucose prediction algorithms for the ICU.

Oisin Fitzgerald, Oscar Perez-Concha, Blanca Gallego, Manoj K Saxena, Lachlan Rudd, Alejandro Metke-Jimenez, Louisa Jorm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hospital Diabetes Meeting 2022.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oisin FitzgeraldCentre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-8869
Oscar Perez-ConchaCentre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-7090
Blanca GallegoCentre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3704-7975
Manoj K SaxenaThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lachlan RuddData and Analytics, eHealth NSW, Chatswood, NSW, Australia.
Alejandro Metke-JimenezAustralian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Louisa JormCentre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0390-661X
UNSW Sydney · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlycemic control is an important component of critical care. We present a data-driven method for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) patient response to glycemic control protocols while accounting for patient heterogeneity and variations in care. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing electronic medical records (EMRs) of 18 961 ICU admissions from the MIMIC-III dataset, including 318 574 blood glucose measurements, we train and validate a gradient boosted tree machine learning (ML) algorithm to forecast patient blood glucose and a 95% prediction interval at 2-hour intervals. The model uses as inputs irregular multivariate time series data relating to recent in-patient medical history and glycemic control, including previous blood glucose, nutrition, and insulin dosing.

resultsOur forecasting model using routinely collected EMRs achieves performance comparable to previous models developed in planned research studies using continuous blood glucose monitoring. Model error, expressed as mean absolute percentage error is 16.5%-16.8%, with Clarke error grid analysis demonstrating that 97% of predictions would be clinically acceptable. The 95% prediction intervals achieve near intended coverage at 93%-94%. DISCUSSION: ML algorithms built on observational data sources, such as EMRs, present a promising approach for personalization and automation of glycemic control in critical care. Future research may benefit from applying a combination of methodologies and data sources to develop robust methodologies that account for the variations seen in ICU patients and difficultly in detecting the extremes of observed blood glucose values.

conclusionWe demonstrate that EMRs can be used to train ML algorithms that may be suitable for incorporation into ICU decision support systems.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringAlgorithmsHumansInsulinIntensive Care UnitsBlood GlucoseInsulinblood glucosecritical careelectronic health recordsmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID33871017
PMCPMC8324237
OpenAlexW3154529071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.