ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021
Incorporating real-world evidence into the development of patient blood glucose prediction algorithms for the ICU.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Day Glycemic Exposure and 28-Day Mortality in the ICU: A Multicohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- First-Day Glycemic Exposure and 28-Day Mortality in the ICU: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- A clustering-based trajectory analytics of functional loss and recovery among older adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- Accurate prediction of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia using machine learning in critically ill patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for real-time blood glucose prediction for ICU patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A distributional reinforcement learning model for optimal glucose control after cardiac surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Daily variation in blood glucose levels during continuous enteral nutrition in patients on the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study.EBioMedicine · 2024Observational
- The relationship between hyperglycaemia on admission and patient outcome is modified by hyperlactatemia and diabetic status: a retrospective analysis of the eICU collaborative research database.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prediction of Next Glucose Measurement in Hospitalized Patients by Comparing Various Regression Methods: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting and Diagnosing Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Review
- Hospital Diabetes Meeting 2022.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Models for Inpatient Glucose Prediction.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGlycemic control is an important component of critical care. We present a data-driven method for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) patient response to glycemic control protocols while accounting for patient heterogeneity and variations in care. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing electronic medical records (EMRs) of 18 961 ICU admissions from the MIMIC-III dataset, including 318 574 blood glucose measurements, we train and validate a gradient boosted tree machine learning (ML) algorithm to forecast patient blood glucose and a 95% prediction interval at 2-hour intervals. The model uses as inputs irregular multivariate time series data relating to recent in-patient medical history and glycemic control, including previous blood glucose, nutrition, and insulin dosing.
resultsOur forecasting model using routinely collected EMRs achieves performance comparable to previous models developed in planned research studies using continuous blood glucose monitoring. Model error, expressed as mean absolute percentage error is 16.5%-16.8%, with Clarke error grid analysis demonstrating that 97% of predictions would be clinically acceptable. The 95% prediction intervals achieve near intended coverage at 93%-94%. DISCUSSION: ML algorithms built on observational data sources, such as EMRs, present a promising approach for personalization and automation of glycemic control in critical care. Future research may benefit from applying a combination of methodologies and data sources to develop robust methodologies that account for the variations seen in ICU patients and difficultly in detecting the extremes of observed blood glucose values.
conclusionWe demonstrate that EMRs can be used to train ML algorithms that may be suitable for incorporation into ICU decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.