Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870715›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Rotigaptide Infusion for the First 7 Days After Myocardial Infarction-Reperfusion Reduced Late Complexity of Myocardial Architecture of the Healing Border-Zone and Arrhythmia Inducibility.

Rasheda A Chowdhury, Michael T Debney, Andrea Protti, Balvinder S Handa, Kiran H K Patel, Alexander R Lyon, Ajay M Shah, Fu Siong Ng, Nicholas S Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The electrophysiology of ventricular cell pairs.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rasheda A ChowdhuryNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Michael T DebneyNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Andrea ProttiKing's British Heart Foundation Centre School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences Kings College London London United Kingdom.
Balvinder S HandaNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Kiran H K PatelNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Alexander R LyonNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Ajay M ShahKing's British Heart Foundation Centre School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences Kings College London London United Kingdom.
Fu Siong NgNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart & Lung Institute and ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial Centre for Cardiac EngineeringImperial College London London United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1999001/11735British Heart Foundation FS/11/67/28954British Heart Foundation PG/16/17/32069British Heart Foundation RG/16/3/32175Department of Health CL‐2011‐21‐001Medical Research Council G0900396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Survivors of myocardial infarction are at increased risk of late ventricular arrhythmias, with infarct size and scar heterogeneity being key determinants of arrhythmic risk. Gap junctions facilitate the passage of small ions and morphogenic cell signaling between myocytes. We hypothesized that gap junctions enhancement during infarction-reperfusion modulates structural and electrophysiological remodeling and reduces late arrhythmogenesis. Methods and Results Infarction-reperfusion surgery was carried out in male Sprague-Dawley rats followed by 7 days of rotigaptide or saline administration. The in vivo and ex vivo arrhythmogenicity was characterized by programmed electrical stimulation 3 weeks later, followed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Masson's trichrome histology. Three weeks after 7-day postinfarction administration of rotigaptide, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was induced on programmed electrical stimulation in 20% and 53% of rats, respectively (rotigaptide versus control), resulting in reduction of arrhythmia score (3.2 versus 1.4,

Indexed as

AnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacInfusions, IntravenousMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumOligopeptidesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySeverity of Illness IndexOligopeptidesrotigaptidegap junctioninfarct heterogeneityrotigaptideventricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID33870715
PMCPMC8200720
OpenAlexW3155080847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.