ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Predictors of Use and Outcomes of Mechanical Valve Replacement in the United States (2008-2017).
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morbidity and Long-Term Mortality Predictors Following Isolated Mitral Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Cohort Study on the Effect of Sex.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Ross Procedure Renaissance: A Contemporary Review of Patient Selection, Technique, and Long-Term Outcomes in Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Long-term clinical outcomes in patients between the age of 50-70 years receiving biological versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Scaffolds of Decellularized Heart Valves Modified by Electrospun Polylactic Acid.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Y-incision aortic root enlargement.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- A Mobile Application for Anticoagulation Management in Patients After Heart Valve Replacement: A Usability Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation with J-valve in patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Readmissions After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Influence of Prosthesis Type.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Article
- Evaluating Reference Ages for Selecting Prosthesis Types for Heart Valve Replacement in Korea.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Heart Valve Surgery in Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients-Morbidity and Mortality.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
- Utilization of mechanical prostheses and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement at safety net hospitals.Surgery open science · 2022Article
- Trend and early outcomes in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Immobilized Bisphosphonates as Potential Inhibitors of Bioprosthetic Calcification: Effects on Various Xenogeneic Cardiovascular Tissues.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Predictors of Use and Outcomes of Mechanical Valve Replacement in the United States (2008-2017).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Contemporary nationwide data on the use, predictors, and outcomes of mechanical valve replacement in patients less than 70 years of age are limited. Methods and Results We identified hospitalizations for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. The study's end points included predictors of mechanical valve replacement and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Among 253 100 hospitalizations for AVR, the use rate of mechanical prosthesis decreased from 45.3% in 2008 to 17.0% in 2017. Among 284 962 hospitalizations for MVR, mechanical prosthesis use decreased from 59.5% in 2008 to 29.2% in 2017 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.