Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870659›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2021

Functional outcomes and post-discharge care sought by patients with COVID-19 compared to matched controls after completing inpatient acute rehabilitation.

Esha Jain, Erin Y Harmon, Matthew B Sonagere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Social determinants of health and COVID-19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esha JainDepartment of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Erin Y HarmonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-2036
Matthew B SonagereDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital, Schenectady, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA subset of patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) can develop severe illness, resulting in significant functional and cognitive deficits that require acute inpatient rehabilitation. Guidelines following discharge from acute inpatient rehabilitation have not yet been established. This study seeks to establish outcomes of rehabilitation patients with COVID-19 and characterize their need for long-term care.

objectiveTo determine the functional outcomes and utilization of follow-up medical care for patients with COVID-19 90 days following discharge from acute inpatient rehabilitation, as compared to rehabilitation impairment and age-matched controls.

designProspective, single-center cohort study.

settingInpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). PATIENTS: Sixty-four patients recovering from COVID-19 and 64 age and impairment group category controls were identified to answer survey questions following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. A total of 36 patients participated in the study (18 patients with COVID-19 and 18 controls).

interventionsNot applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Functional outcomes at discharge (GG Self-Care and Mobility Activities items of the IRF-PAI Version 3.0), hospital readmissions, and follow-up care sought by patients.

resultsThe COVID-19 patient group had similar improvements in functional outcomes as compared to controls. Patients with COVID-19 required fewer 0-90 day readmissions than their matched controls (22.2% vs 61.1%, P < .05), but there were no differences in 0-90 day urgent care/emergency department visits, clinic visits and use of outpatient therapies.

conclusionsPatients with functional deficits as a result of COVID-19 who require multiple therapy disciplines should be considered for acute inpatient rehabilitation as this study demonstrates their ability to participate in and benefit from IRF level care.

Indexed as

AftercareCOVID-19Physical Functional PerformanceAgedFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeProspective StudiesRehabilitation Centers

Identifiers

PMID33870659
PMCPMC8250521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.