Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870476›Full record

Observational studyEuropean geriatric medicine2021

Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study.

Katleen Fagard, Kasper Hermans, Mieke Deschodt, Sofie Van de Wouwer, Frank Vander Aa, Johan Flamaing

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European geriatric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Urinary retention and postrenal kidney injury].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katleen FagardDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 7003 35, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. katleen.fagard@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-4432
Kasper HermansDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mieke DeschodtDivision of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sofie Van de WouwerDepartment of Endocrinology, GZA Hospital, Campus Gasthuiszusters, Antwerp, Belgium.
Frank Vander AaDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan FlamaingDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 7003 35, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrinary retention (UR) is common in older patients. The aim of this observational cohort study was to measure the prevalence of UR in patients aged ≥ 75 years on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit and to determine which at risk group would benefit from screening.

methodsPost-void residual volumes (PVR) were measured within 3 days of admission with an ultrasound bladder scan. Uni- and multivariable analysis were used to determine risk factors associated with PVR ≥ 150 and ≥ 300 millilitres.

resultsNinety-four patients, mean age 84.6 years, were included. The male/female ratio was 0.7. Patients with PVR ≥ 150 (29.8%) had more urological comorbidities, symptoms of overflow incontinence, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, faecal impaction, urinary tract infection (UTI) and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Patients with PVR ≥ 300 lived less at home, had more urological comorbidities, dysuria, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, constipation, faecal impaction, UTI, detrusor relaxants, and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Voiding difficulties and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 150. Not living at home, reporting subtotal voiding, constipation, and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 300.

conclusionScreening for UR on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit is most indicated in patients with urinary and defaecation problems. However, because the prevalence was high, because UR was also observed in patients without these problems, and history taking may be difficult, the threshold for PVR measurement in acutely ill geriatric patients should be low.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NTC04715971, January 19, 2021 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Urinary RetentionAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsBladder scanElderlyPost-void residual volumePrevalenceRisk factorsUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID33870476
PMCPMC8463401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.