Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870276›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2020

Use of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Improve Communication with Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients. A Pilot Study.

Venu Pasricha, Diane Gorman, Kemarut Laothamatas, Abhishek Bhardwaj, Niharika Ganta, Mark E Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Professional quality of life of hospital nurses: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rural Hospital Disparities in Goals of Care Documentation.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Using Natural Language Processing to Classify Serious Illness Communication with Oncology Patients.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2022
    Article
  17. The Intersection of Health and Critical Illness: Preservation and Restoration.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Venu PasrichaPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Diane GormanPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kemarut LaothamatasPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abhishek BhardwajCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
Niharika GantaPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mark E MikkelsenPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

communicationcritical careend of lifeintensive care unitmechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID33870276
PMCPMC8043290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.